Mesial movement of maxillary first molars and vertical dimensional changes in orthodontic extraction treatment for patients with different facial morphology

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A. Alwadei, Farhan Alwadei, Ali Alfarhan, M. Upadhyay, Saleh H Alwadei
{"title":"Mesial movement of maxillary first molars and vertical dimensional changes in orthodontic extraction treatment for patients with different facial morphology","authors":"A. Alwadei, Farhan Alwadei, Ali Alfarhan, M. Upadhyay, Saleh H Alwadei","doi":"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v13i4.618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Primarily, to compare anchorage loss and changes in mandibular plane (MP) angle, overbite, and amount of horizontal, vertical, and angular movements of maxillary incisors in groups of hypodivergent, hyperdivergent, and normodivergent patients. Secondarily, to analyze the relationship between those factors.\nMethods: Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms of 89 patients treated with extraction of four bicuspids or two maxillary bicuspids were analyzed. The sample was divided into three groups based on their facial pattern measured by SN-MP angle (hypodivergent: < 270, hyperdivergent: >380, and normodivergent: 270-380). Linear and angular measurements included the distances of U1 tip and U6 mesial height of contour to Y-axis (i.e., line perpendicular to the X-axis, passing through Sella turcica), distance of U1 tip to Sella on X-axis, overbite, angulation of U1 to palatal plane, and SN-MP and ANB angles. Inferential statistics included one-way ANOVA, Chi-square test, independent t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients.\nResults: Facial morphology did not primarily affect anchorage loss, because other factors such as crowding, severity of Class II molar relationship, and extraction modality played more impactful role (P< 0.01). Change in mandibular plane angle was neither influenced by, nor correlated with, initial facial morphology or anchorage loss (P> 0.05). Positive change in overbite was significantly correlated with facial pattern, incisor extrusion and retroclination (r= 0.30, 0.44, and -0.35, respectively, P< 0.01).\nConclusion: Anchorage loss in extraction orthodontic treatment is not influenced primarily by initial facial morphology. Anchorage loss is not significantly associated with MP angle reduction. Change in overbite can be achieved through incisor extrusion and retroclination.","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v13i4.618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Primarily, to compare anchorage loss and changes in mandibular plane (MP) angle, overbite, and amount of horizontal, vertical, and angular movements of maxillary incisors in groups of hypodivergent, hyperdivergent, and normodivergent patients. Secondarily, to analyze the relationship between those factors. Methods: Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms of 89 patients treated with extraction of four bicuspids or two maxillary bicuspids were analyzed. The sample was divided into three groups based on their facial pattern measured by SN-MP angle (hypodivergent: < 270, hyperdivergent: >380, and normodivergent: 270-380). Linear and angular measurements included the distances of U1 tip and U6 mesial height of contour to Y-axis (i.e., line perpendicular to the X-axis, passing through Sella turcica), distance of U1 tip to Sella on X-axis, overbite, angulation of U1 to palatal plane, and SN-MP and ANB angles. Inferential statistics included one-way ANOVA, Chi-square test, independent t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Results: Facial morphology did not primarily affect anchorage loss, because other factors such as crowding, severity of Class II molar relationship, and extraction modality played more impactful role (P< 0.01). Change in mandibular plane angle was neither influenced by, nor correlated with, initial facial morphology or anchorage loss (P> 0.05). Positive change in overbite was significantly correlated with facial pattern, incisor extrusion and retroclination (r= 0.30, 0.44, and -0.35, respectively, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Anchorage loss in extraction orthodontic treatment is not influenced primarily by initial facial morphology. Anchorage loss is not significantly associated with MP angle reduction. Change in overbite can be achieved through incisor extrusion and retroclination.
不同面部形态患者上颌第一磨牙近缘运动及垂直尺寸变化在正畸拔牙治疗中的应用
目的:首先,比较低分化、高分化和正常分化患者组中上颌切牙的锚定损失和下颌平面(MP)角、覆牙以及水平、垂直和角度运动量的变化。其次,分析这些因素之间的关系。方法:对89例上颌骨四尖或两尖拔除患者治疗前后的头影进行分析。根据SN-MP角测量的面部模式,将样本分为三组(低剂量组:<270,高发散组:>380,正发散组:270-380)。线性和角度测量包括U1尖端和U6轮廓的近中高度到Y轴的距离(即垂直于X轴的线,穿过Sella turcica),U1尖端到X轴Sella的距离,覆被,U1到腭平面的角度,以及SN-MP和ANB角。推断统计学包括单因素方差分析、卡方检验、独立t检验和皮尔逊相关系数。结果:面部形态并不主要影响锚定损失,因为拥挤、II类磨牙关系严重程度和拔除方式等其他因素的影响更大(P<0.01),覆牙的阳性变化与面型、切牙挤压和后倾显著相关(r分别为0.30、0.44和-0.35,P<0.01)。锚固损失与MP角度减小没有显著关联。覆牙的改变可以通过切牙挤压和后倾来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信