Reconciling Catholic responses to Religious Education reform in England – empirical and analytical reflections

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Anthony Towey, P. McGrail
{"title":"Reconciling Catholic responses to Religious Education reform in England – empirical and analytical reflections","authors":"Anthony Towey, P. McGrail","doi":"10.1080/19422539.2020.1811007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent policy reforms regarding Religious Education (RE) in England and Wales have provoked a variety of reactions among faith communities, ecclesial stakeholders, academics, practitioners, senior leaders and students themselves. In this article, we assess the situation in the Catholic context using empirical and analytical tools which shed light on the nature of the subject in a manner relevant to the non-faith sector and internationally. We demonstrate that vectors of reform have drawn attention to key pedagogical aporia in RE such as ‘academic accessibility vs academic rigour’, ‘confessional truth vs critical doubt’, ‘exclusivity vs inclusivity’ and ‘information vs formation.’ Although these risk fomenting partizan binaries at an important time in the evolution of the subject, we contend that such tensions actually underpin the discipline, helping to articulate both its peculiarly holistic ambition and its transformative possibilities. Thus understood, RE becomes a spacious place, deliberately mapped by co-ordinates of paradox.","PeriodicalId":54060,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in Catholic Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"236 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19422539.2020.1811007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in Catholic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19422539.2020.1811007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent policy reforms regarding Religious Education (RE) in England and Wales have provoked a variety of reactions among faith communities, ecclesial stakeholders, academics, practitioners, senior leaders and students themselves. In this article, we assess the situation in the Catholic context using empirical and analytical tools which shed light on the nature of the subject in a manner relevant to the non-faith sector and internationally. We demonstrate that vectors of reform have drawn attention to key pedagogical aporia in RE such as ‘academic accessibility vs academic rigour’, ‘confessional truth vs critical doubt’, ‘exclusivity vs inclusivity’ and ‘information vs formation.’ Although these risk fomenting partizan binaries at an important time in the evolution of the subject, we contend that such tensions actually underpin the discipline, helping to articulate both its peculiarly holistic ambition and its transformative possibilities. Thus understood, RE becomes a spacious place, deliberately mapped by co-ordinates of paradox.
协调天主教对英国宗教教育改革的反应——实证和分析思考
英格兰和威尔士最近关于宗教教育的政策改革在信仰社区、教会利益相关者、学者、从业者、高级领导人和学生本人中引发了各种反应。在这篇文章中,我们使用实证和分析工具来评估天主教背景下的情况,这些工具以与非信仰部门和国际相关的方式阐明了主题的性质。我们证明,改革的载体已经引起了人们对RE中关键教学aporia的关注,如“学术可及性与学术严谨性”、“忏悔真理与批判性怀疑”、“排他性与包容性”和“信息与形成”尽管这些风险在学科发展的重要时刻引发了党派二元对立,但我们认为,这种紧张关系实际上是学科的基础,有助于阐明其独特的整体野心和变革的可能性。因此,RE变成了一个宽敞的地方,被悖论的坐标刻意映射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信