FILSAFAT BARAT ERA SKOLASTIK Telaah Kritis Pemikiran Thomas Aquinas

M. Taufik
{"title":"FILSAFAT BARAT ERA SKOLASTIK Telaah Kritis Pemikiran Thomas Aquinas","authors":"M. Taufik","doi":"10.18592/JIIU.V19I2.4444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper tries to discuss how Western philosophy critically examined the thought of Thomas Aquinas in the scholastic era. The scholastic era or known medieval philosophy whose style is the philosophy of collaborating with theology in harmony. Philosophy in the scholastic era gave birth to many famous theologians-philosophers, one of whom was Thomas Aquinas, who was the subject of this paper. After the authors traced through this paper the answer found that Aquinas was the most important figure of Western philosophy in the scholastic era. Aquinas is considered to have made a real contribution in unifying the original elements of Augustine's thought, strongly influenced by the philosophy of Neo-Platonism, with the philosophy of Aristotle.The author criticized Aquinas's view that Aristotle's philosophical system contains true rational truths. Basically using philosophical methods to understand theology is very helpful. That has been done by Aquinas; it only needs to be underlined that the method for understanding philosophy without losing the nature of theology is not entirely correct either. However there are also problems that cannot be fully explained by philosophical approaches. Like the problem of beliefs related to metaphysical problems, for example. The problem of belief in matters that are metaphysical is a problem that is difficult to explain philosophical logic. Aquinas stated that theological truth is clear to human reason. For example, it is the truth about God's existence. This truth comes from revelation, but how to explain philosophically that can satisfy curiosity so that what is believed can be understood rationally.","PeriodicalId":32673,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18592/JIIU.V19I2.4444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractThis paper tries to discuss how Western philosophy critically examined the thought of Thomas Aquinas in the scholastic era. The scholastic era or known medieval philosophy whose style is the philosophy of collaborating with theology in harmony. Philosophy in the scholastic era gave birth to many famous theologians-philosophers, one of whom was Thomas Aquinas, who was the subject of this paper. After the authors traced through this paper the answer found that Aquinas was the most important figure of Western philosophy in the scholastic era. Aquinas is considered to have made a real contribution in unifying the original elements of Augustine's thought, strongly influenced by the philosophy of Neo-Platonism, with the philosophy of Aristotle.The author criticized Aquinas's view that Aristotle's philosophical system contains true rational truths. Basically using philosophical methods to understand theology is very helpful. That has been done by Aquinas; it only needs to be underlined that the method for understanding philosophy without losing the nature of theology is not entirely correct either. However there are also problems that cannot be fully explained by philosophical approaches. Like the problem of beliefs related to metaphysical problems, for example. The problem of belief in matters that are metaphysical is a problem that is difficult to explain philosophical logic. Aquinas stated that theological truth is clear to human reason. For example, it is the truth about God's existence. This truth comes from revelation, but how to explain philosophically that can satisfy curiosity so that what is believed can be understood rationally.
西方学术哲学研究了托马斯·阿奎那的批判性思维
摘要本文试图探讨西方哲学在学院派时代对托马斯·阿奎那思想的批判性审视。经院哲学或中世纪哲学,其风格是与神学和谐合作的哲学。经院哲学产生了许多著名的神学家哲学家,托马斯·阿奎那就是其中之一,他是本文的研究对象。通过对本文的追溯,笔者发现阿奎那是西方经院哲学时代最重要的人物。人们认为,阿奎那在统一受新柏拉图主义哲学强烈影响的奥古斯丁思想的原始元素与亚里士多德哲学方面做出了真正的贡献。作者批判了阿奎那认为亚里士多德的哲学体系包含真正的理性真理的观点。基本上用哲学的方法来理解神学是很有帮助的。这是阿奎那做的;只需要强调的是,理解哲学而不失去神学性质的方法也不完全正确。然而,也有一些问题无法用哲学方法完全解释。比如与形而上学问题相关的信仰问题。对形而上学事物的信仰问题是一个难以解释哲学逻辑的问题。阿奎那说神学真理对人类理性是清楚的。例如,它是关于上帝存在的真理。这个真理来自于启示,但如何从哲学上解释,以满足好奇心,使所相信的可以理性地理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信