Knighthoods and Empty Benches: Wilkie Collins’s Armadale and the Late Victorian Culture Industry

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Robert Laurella
{"title":"Knighthoods and Empty Benches: Wilkie Collins’s Armadale and the Late Victorian Culture Industry","authors":"Robert Laurella","doi":"10.46911/tnox1088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In locating Wilkie Collins’s novel Armadale (1866) in the context of its two subsequent dramatic versions, this article considers how the Victorian culture industry contended with an aggressively expanding market economy. It positions Collins’s work amid an ongoing Victorian debate that was especially prevalent in literary and dramatic periodicals concerning the bifurcated development of English drama and novels. Highlighting how Collins flexibly adapted his writing for the stage in the face of legal, commercial, and artistic pressures strengthens emerging links between the ostensibly discrete fields of novelistic and theatrical writing. The adaptation of novels for the stage is one of the primary areas where developing intellectual property law collided with cultural production, opening up, for writers such as Collins, new avenues to write, produce, and entertain. This article aims to expand on recent studies of the evolving nature of copyright law in the nineteenth century by considering the forms of cultural production that context facilitated. Considering the legal context of these adaptations in concert with, however, and not as ancillary to or separate from, their social and political valences highlights the modes of production that arose despite – or perhaps as a result of – the opaque nature of Victorian intellectual property laws. Wilkie Collins the successful dramatist, as opposed to Wilkie Collins the novelist writing for the stage, emerged in his own right partly due to the copyright contests that initially encouraged him to adapt his novels in the first place.","PeriodicalId":34865,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Popular Fictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Popular Fictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46911/tnox1088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In locating Wilkie Collins’s novel Armadale (1866) in the context of its two subsequent dramatic versions, this article considers how the Victorian culture industry contended with an aggressively expanding market economy. It positions Collins’s work amid an ongoing Victorian debate that was especially prevalent in literary and dramatic periodicals concerning the bifurcated development of English drama and novels. Highlighting how Collins flexibly adapted his writing for the stage in the face of legal, commercial, and artistic pressures strengthens emerging links between the ostensibly discrete fields of novelistic and theatrical writing. The adaptation of novels for the stage is one of the primary areas where developing intellectual property law collided with cultural production, opening up, for writers such as Collins, new avenues to write, produce, and entertain. This article aims to expand on recent studies of the evolving nature of copyright law in the nineteenth century by considering the forms of cultural production that context facilitated. Considering the legal context of these adaptations in concert with, however, and not as ancillary to or separate from, their social and political valences highlights the modes of production that arose despite – or perhaps as a result of – the opaque nature of Victorian intellectual property laws. Wilkie Collins the successful dramatist, as opposed to Wilkie Collins the novelist writing for the stage, emerged in his own right partly due to the copyright contests that initially encouraged him to adapt his novels in the first place.
骑士与空板凳:威尔基·科林斯的阿玛代尔与维多利亚晚期文化产业
本文将威尔基·柯林斯的小说《阿玛代尔》(1866)置于其后两个戏剧性版本的背景下,考察维多利亚时代的文化工业如何与积极扩张的市场经济相抗衡。它将柯林斯的作品置于维多利亚时代一场持续不断的辩论中,这场辩论在文学和戏剧期刊上尤其普遍,涉及英国戏剧和小说的分叉发展。强调柯林斯在面对法律、商业和艺术压力时如何灵活地将他的作品改编为舞台,加强了小说和戏剧写作这两个表面上分离的领域之间的联系。小说的舞台改编是知识产权法发展与文化生产相碰撞的主要领域之一,为柯林斯等作家开辟了写作、制作和娱乐的新途径。本文旨在通过考虑语境促进的文化生产形式,扩展19世纪版权法演变性质的最新研究。然而,考虑到这些改编的法律背景是一致的,而不是辅助或分离的,它们的社会和政治价值突出了生产模式,尽管——或者可能是——维多利亚时代知识产权法不透明的本质。威尔基·柯林斯是一个成功的剧作家,而威尔基·柯林斯是一个为舞台写作的小说家,他的出现部分是由于版权之争,版权之争最初鼓励他改编自己的小说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Victorian Popular Fictions
Victorian Popular Fictions Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信