Rethinking Unjust Enrichment: Advancing Distributive Justice in Indonesian Law

Rechtsidee Pub Date : 2023-04-29 DOI:10.21070/jihr.v12i1.961
Rian Ganggas Puspatara, I. Kurniawan
{"title":"Rethinking Unjust Enrichment: Advancing Distributive Justice in Indonesian Law","authors":"Rian Ganggas Puspatara, I. Kurniawan","doi":"10.21070/jihr.v12i1.961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the development of the unjust enrichment doctrine in Indonesia from a progressive legal perspective. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, comparative, and legislative approaches, the study confirms that the philosophical orientation of the unjust enrichment doctrine in Indonesian civil law is expected to optimize the idea of distributive justice, which is relevant in civil practice. The actualization of the unjust enrichment doctrine in a progressive legal perspective can be achieved through philosophical, theoretical, and practical approaches. By exploring the principles of proportionality and Pancasila values as Indonesia's legal ideals, integrating the development of unjust enrichment doctrine within the theoretical framework of tortious acts, and promoting the active and creative utilization of Article 1359 of the Indonesian Civil Code, this study offers insights for judges and legal practitioners in their pursuit of justice in civil cases based on unjust enrichment claims.Highlights: \n \nPhilosophical orientation: Emphasizes distributive justice and embraces Pancasila values as Indonesia's legal ideals. \nTheoretical development: Integrates unjust enrichment doctrine within the framework of tortious acts. \nPractical approach: Encourages active and creative utilization of Article 1359 of the Indonesian Civil Code by judges and legal practitioners. \n \nKeywords: unjust enrichment, progressive legal perspective, distributive justice, Indonesian civil law, Pancasila values \n ","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the development of the unjust enrichment doctrine in Indonesia from a progressive legal perspective. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, comparative, and legislative approaches, the study confirms that the philosophical orientation of the unjust enrichment doctrine in Indonesian civil law is expected to optimize the idea of distributive justice, which is relevant in civil practice. The actualization of the unjust enrichment doctrine in a progressive legal perspective can be achieved through philosophical, theoretical, and practical approaches. By exploring the principles of proportionality and Pancasila values as Indonesia's legal ideals, integrating the development of unjust enrichment doctrine within the theoretical framework of tortious acts, and promoting the active and creative utilization of Article 1359 of the Indonesian Civil Code, this study offers insights for judges and legal practitioners in their pursuit of justice in civil cases based on unjust enrichment claims.Highlights: Philosophical orientation: Emphasizes distributive justice and embraces Pancasila values as Indonesia's legal ideals. Theoretical development: Integrates unjust enrichment doctrine within the framework of tortious acts. Practical approach: Encourages active and creative utilization of Article 1359 of the Indonesian Civil Code by judges and legal practitioners. Keywords: unjust enrichment, progressive legal perspective, distributive justice, Indonesian civil law, Pancasila values  
反思不当得利:推进印尼法律中的分配正义
本研究旨在从进步的法律角度分析不当得利原则在印尼的发展。本研究采用概念、比较和立法的规范性法律研究方法,证实印尼民法中不当得利原则的哲学取向有望优化分配正义理念,这在民事实践中是相关的。在进步的法律视野下,不当得利原则的实现可以通过哲学、理论和实践途径来实现。本研究通过探索比例原则和Pancasila价值观作为印尼的法律理想,将不当得利理论的发展整合到侵权行为的理论框架中,并促进印尼民法典第1359条的积极和创造性运用,为法官和法律从业者在不当得利民事案件中追求正义提供启示。亮点:哲学取向:强调分配正义,将潘卡西拉价值观作为印尼的法律理想。理论发展:将不当得利理论纳入侵权行为框架。实际做法:鼓励法官和法律从业人员积极和创造性地利用《印度尼西亚民法典》第1359条。关键词:不当得利,进步法学视角,分配正义,印尼民法,潘卡西拉价值观
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信