Sanctioned by Government? The Home Office, Peterloo and the Six Acts

N. Bend
{"title":"Sanctioned by Government? The Home Office, Peterloo and the Six Acts","authors":"N. Bend","doi":"10.7227/BJRL.95.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the Home Office in the Peterloo Massacre remains contentious. This\n article assesses the available evidence from the Home Office and the private\n correspondence of Home Secretary Viscount Sidmouth to contest E. P.\n Thompson’s claim that the Home Office ‘assented’ to the\n arrest of Henry Hunt at St Peter’s Fields. Peterloo is placed within the\n context of government’s response to political radicalism to show how the\n Tory ministry had no clear counter-radical strategy in the months leading up to\n the August event. The article further argues that although the Home Office may\n not have assented to forceful intervention on the day, the event and its\n aftermath were needed to justify the Six Acts which would ultimately cripple the\n reform movement.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7227/BJRL.95.1.2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/BJRL.95.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the Home Office in the Peterloo Massacre remains contentious. This article assesses the available evidence from the Home Office and the private correspondence of Home Secretary Viscount Sidmouth to contest E. P. Thompson’s claim that the Home Office ‘assented’ to the arrest of Henry Hunt at St Peter’s Fields. Peterloo is placed within the context of government’s response to political radicalism to show how the Tory ministry had no clear counter-radical strategy in the months leading up to the August event. The article further argues that although the Home Office may not have assented to forceful intervention on the day, the event and its aftermath were needed to justify the Six Acts which would ultimately cripple the reform movement.
政府批准?内政部,彼得路和六幕
内政部在彼得罗大屠杀中的作用仍然存在争议。本文评估了内政部的现有证据和内政大臣西德茅斯子爵的私人信件,以反驳E.P.汤普森关于内政部“同意”在圣彼得球场逮捕亨利·亨特的说法。彼得罗被置于政府应对政治激进主义的背景下,以表明保守党在8月事件发生前的几个月里没有明确的反激进战略。文章进一步认为,尽管内政部可能没有同意当天的有力干预,但这一事件及其后果是为最终削弱改革运动的六项法案辩护所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信