Threshold Effect of Institutional Quality and the Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
T. A. Masron, Y. Subramanian
{"title":"Threshold Effect of Institutional Quality and the Validity of Environmental Kuznets Curve","authors":"T. A. Masron, Y. Subramanian","doi":"10.22452/mjes.vol57no1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a threshold estimation technique, this study examines the validity of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) under different institutional quality regimes. A combined set of 99 developed and developing countries over the period from 2008 to 2016 has been chosen to confirm the issue in hand. Adopting panel threshold regression technique by Hansen (1999), the paper finds evidence substantiating the presence of single threshold effect. In general, we find that EKC hypothesis does not hold in the full sample analysis, in which high income fails to bring environmental degradation down. Only in the case of a segregated sample of developed countries, we find that the impact of high income (or income square) on environmental degradation is negative and significant after a certain level of ‘high’ institutional quality has been attained. On the contrary, EKC is found to be invalid, and high income fails to be converted fully to environment-protecting activities in developing countries. Therefore, the effectiveness of income in mitigating environmental issues seems to be dampened by the poor institutional quality in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol57no1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Using a threshold estimation technique, this study examines the validity of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) under different institutional quality regimes. A combined set of 99 developed and developing countries over the period from 2008 to 2016 has been chosen to confirm the issue in hand. Adopting panel threshold regression technique by Hansen (1999), the paper finds evidence substantiating the presence of single threshold effect. In general, we find that EKC hypothesis does not hold in the full sample analysis, in which high income fails to bring environmental degradation down. Only in the case of a segregated sample of developed countries, we find that the impact of high income (or income square) on environmental degradation is negative and significant after a certain level of ‘high’ institutional quality has been attained. On the contrary, EKC is found to be invalid, and high income fails to be converted fully to environment-protecting activities in developing countries. Therefore, the effectiveness of income in mitigating environmental issues seems to be dampened by the poor institutional quality in developing countries.
制度质量的阈值效应与环境库兹涅茨曲线的有效性
本研究采用阈值估计技术,检验了不同制度质量制度下环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)的有效性。选择了2008年至2016年期间的99个发达国家和发展中国家来确认手头的问题。采用Hansen(1999)的面板阈值回归技术,发现了单阈值效应存在的证据。总的来说,我们发现EKC假说在全样本分析中并不成立,在全样本中,高收入并不能降低环境退化。只有在发达国家的分离样本的情况下,我们发现,在达到一定水平的“高”制度质量后,高收入(或收入平方)对环境退化的影响是负面和显著的。相反,EKC被认为是无效的,发展中国家的高收入未能完全转化为环境保护活动。因此,收入在缓解环境问题方面的有效性似乎受到发展中国家制度质量差的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信