Reply to my critics

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

European Journal of Political Theory Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1177/14748851211002028

Ryan Hanley

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This reply to my five generous and insightful critics – Gianna Englert, David Williams, Alexandra Oprea, Geneviève Rousslière, and Brandon Turner – focuses on three key issues they raise: the relationship of past ideas to present politics, the utility of ideological labels in the history of political thought, and the relationship of political philosophy to religion and theology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

回复批评我的人

这是对我的五位慷慨而富有洞察力的批评者——吉安娜·恩格尔特、大卫·威廉姆斯、亚历山德拉·奥普雷亚、Geneviève Rousslière和布兰登·特纳——的回复，重点关注他们提出的三个关键问题：过去思想与现在政治的关系、意识形态标签在政治思想史上的效用，以及政治哲学与宗教和神学的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Political Theory POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Political Theory provides a high profile research forum. Broad in scope and international in readership, the Journal is named after its geographical location, but is committed to advancing original debates in political theory in the widest possible sense--geographical, historical, and ideological. The Journal publishes contributions in analytic political philosophy, political theory, comparative political thought, and the history of ideas of any tradition. Work that challenges orthodoxies and disrupts entrenched debates is particularly encouraged. All research articles are subject to triple-blind peer-review by internationally renowned scholars in order to ensure the highest standards of quality and impartiality.