Assessment of the Antihyperlipidemic Effect of Garlic Vs Pitavastatin in Patients with Moderate Hyperlipidemia: A Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Q3 Health Professions
M. W. Saeed, S. Gillani, Rana Kamran Mahmood, Muhammad Usman
{"title":"Assessment of the Antihyperlipidemic Effect of Garlic Vs Pitavastatin in Patients with Moderate Hyperlipidemia: A Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"M. W. Saeed, S. Gillani, Rana Kamran Mahmood, Muhammad Usman","doi":"10.12982/cmujns.2021.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To assess the efficacy of garlic in comparison with pitavastatin in reducing hypercholesteremia. Databases that include PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, TRIP and SCOPUS were searched. All randomised controlled trials selected for the study. Studies comparing garlic with placebo and pitavastatin with either placebo or other drugs were selected to treat hypercholesteremia. Statistical analysis done using a random-effect model, and results expressed in Mean difference and variance for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twelve studies analysed the efficacy of garlic compared to pitavastatin. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides assessed for garlic and pitavastatin's comparative efficacy. Mean difference noticed in total cholesterol in garlic arm was -13.604 with 95% CI = -22.246, -4.962 while in pitavastatin group was -28.205 (95% CI = -29.016,-27.394). The LDL-c reduction not recorded in the garlic arm where the mean increase was recorded of 0.309 (95% CI = -12.502, 13.120) while in the pitavastatin group was -35.538 (95% CI = -39.992, -31.084). Similarly, the increase in HDL was more in the pitavastatin group 5.308 (95% CI = 0.906, 9.710 compared to garlic (2.754 with 95% CI = 1.069, 4.440). Triglycerides level reduction was also low in whereas pitavastatin was -24.210 with 95% CI = -29.249, -19.171.The analysis showed that garlic has a significant effect on lipid profile. The comparison profile of garlic with pitavastatin showed clinical application in the treatment of mild-moderate hypercholesteremia—further studies required the investigator to use the combination therapy in controlled trials. Keywords: Allicin, Allium sativum, Dyslipidemia, Garlic, Hypercholesteremia, Hyperlipidemia Pitavastatin","PeriodicalId":10049,"journal":{"name":"Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujns.2021.087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract To assess the efficacy of garlic in comparison with pitavastatin in reducing hypercholesteremia. Databases that include PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, TRIP and SCOPUS were searched. All randomised controlled trials selected for the study. Studies comparing garlic with placebo and pitavastatin with either placebo or other drugs were selected to treat hypercholesteremia. Statistical analysis done using a random-effect model, and results expressed in Mean difference and variance for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twelve studies analysed the efficacy of garlic compared to pitavastatin. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides assessed for garlic and pitavastatin's comparative efficacy. Mean difference noticed in total cholesterol in garlic arm was -13.604 with 95% CI = -22.246, -4.962 while in pitavastatin group was -28.205 (95% CI = -29.016,-27.394). The LDL-c reduction not recorded in the garlic arm where the mean increase was recorded of 0.309 (95% CI = -12.502, 13.120) while in the pitavastatin group was -35.538 (95% CI = -39.992, -31.084). Similarly, the increase in HDL was more in the pitavastatin group 5.308 (95% CI = 0.906, 9.710 compared to garlic (2.754 with 95% CI = 1.069, 4.440). Triglycerides level reduction was also low in whereas pitavastatin was -24.210 with 95% CI = -29.249, -19.171.The analysis showed that garlic has a significant effect on lipid profile. The comparison profile of garlic with pitavastatin showed clinical application in the treatment of mild-moderate hypercholesteremia—further studies required the investigator to use the combination therapy in controlled trials. Keywords: Allicin, Allium sativum, Dyslipidemia, Garlic, Hypercholesteremia, Hyperlipidemia Pitavastatin
评估大蒜与匹伐他汀对中度高脂血症患者的降脂作用:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
目的:评价大蒜与匹伐他汀降低高胆固醇血症的疗效。检索了PubMed/Medline、Cochrane、TRIP和SCOPUS等数据库。本研究选择了所有随机对照试验。比较大蒜与安慰剂和匹伐他汀与安慰剂或其他药物治疗高胆固醇血症的研究被选中。采用随机效应模型进行统计分析,连续数据以95%置信区间(CI)的Mean difference and variance表示结果。12项研究分析了大蒜与匹伐他汀的疗效。总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、高密度脂蛋白和甘油三酯对大蒜和匹伐他汀比较疗效的评估。大蒜组总胆固醇平均差异为-13.604 (95% CI = -22.246, -4.962),匹伐他汀组总胆固醇平均差异为-28.205 (95% CI = -29.016,-27.394)。大蒜组的LDL-c降低没有记录,其平均升高记录为0.309 (95% CI = -12.502, 13.120),而匹伐他汀组的LDL-c降低记录为-35.538 (95% CI = -39.992, -31.084)。同样,匹伐他汀组中HDL的增加比大蒜组(2.754,95% CI = 1.069, 4.440)要多(95% CI = 0.906, 9.710)。甘油三酯水平的降低也很低,而匹伐他汀为-24.210,95% CI = -29.249, -19.171。分析表明,大蒜对血脂有显著影响。大蒜与匹伐他汀的对比显示其在治疗轻中度高胆固醇症中的临床应用——进一步的研究要求研究者在对照试验中使用联合治疗。关键词:大蒜素,大蒜,血脂异常,大蒜,高胆固醇血症,匹伐他汀高脂血症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences
Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信