{"title":"“transeant Things”: Materialism and Mortality in the Lyrics of Lucy Hutchinson and Margaret Cavendish","authors":"J. Hock","doi":"10.1086/726101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The poetic atomism of Lucretius seems an obvious point of convergence between Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson, but this convergence is complicated both by their later disavowals of atomism and by scholarship that casts doubt on even their early interest in Lucretius. In this essay, I argue that in their lyrics, Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson engage Lucretius in a hybrid and nondogmatic way that is less focused on atomism’s physical system (that is, on the mechanics of atomist physics) than on using ideas from De rerum natura about poetry and mortality to think about memory, memorialization, and afterlives—of bodies, reputations, and texts. Both Cavendish and Hutchinson engage the issues of materiality and mortality at the heart of Lucretian thought as a way of conceptualizing the capacity of lyric poetry to depict the experience of change and loss at the heart of mortal life, the experience of both being and loving what Hutchinson in her elegies calls “transeant Things.” Hutchinson’s appreciation for and dwelling with “transeant Things” carves out a space within her elegies for an affirmation of both erotic love and also of lyric poetry. [J.H.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The poetic atomism of Lucretius seems an obvious point of convergence between Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson, but this convergence is complicated both by their later disavowals of atomism and by scholarship that casts doubt on even their early interest in Lucretius. In this essay, I argue that in their lyrics, Margaret Cavendish and Lucy Hutchinson engage Lucretius in a hybrid and nondogmatic way that is less focused on atomism’s physical system (that is, on the mechanics of atomist physics) than on using ideas from De rerum natura about poetry and mortality to think about memory, memorialization, and afterlives—of bodies, reputations, and texts. Both Cavendish and Hutchinson engage the issues of materiality and mortality at the heart of Lucretian thought as a way of conceptualizing the capacity of lyric poetry to depict the experience of change and loss at the heart of mortal life, the experience of both being and loving what Hutchinson in her elegies calls “transeant Things.” Hutchinson’s appreciation for and dwelling with “transeant Things” carves out a space within her elegies for an affirmation of both erotic love and also of lyric poetry. [J.H.]
期刊介绍:
English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.