Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Online Ground Round between Audiology and Occupational Therapy Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Marzieh Amiri, D. Hamedi, N. Moradi, F. Taheri, M. Akbari, A. Bayat, Mohammad Khayatzadeh-Mahani, M. Tavakoli, Seifolah Jahantabi-Nejad, Nasibeh Noori Mombeyni, Maryam Delphi, B. Mandani, Sheyda Javadipour
{"title":"Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Online Ground Round between Audiology and Occupational Therapy Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Marzieh Amiri, D. Hamedi, N. Moradi, F. Taheri, M. Akbari, A. Bayat, Mohammad Khayatzadeh-Mahani, M. Tavakoli, Seifolah Jahantabi-Nejad, Nasibeh Noori Mombeyni, Maryam Delphi, B. Mandani, Sheyda Javadipour","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2021.54655.1376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study conducted to explore and compare the effectiveness of an online ground round between two groups of audiology and occupational therapy of Ahvaz Jundishpaur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) students during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods The study groups of this analytical cross-sectional study consisted of all fourth-year undergraduate students of audiology and occupational therapy. After implementation of the online grand round, the satisfaction questionnaire and knowledge exam were completed by the students.Results The level of satisfaction in both groups was above average (average>3); however, there was a significant difference in the mean total score of satisfaction questionnaire between the two groups (P=0.00). The mean score of the knowledge exam was 6.46±1.59 and 6.28±1.89 in the audiology and occupational therapy groups, respectively. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the mean score of this exam between the two groups (P=0.78).Conclusion The online grand round can play an effective role in transferring the teacher's experiences to students during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it is not possible to hold face-to-face classes.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2021.54655.1376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background This study conducted to explore and compare the effectiveness of an online ground round between two groups of audiology and occupational therapy of Ahvaz Jundishpaur University of Medical Sciences (AJUMS) students during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods The study groups of this analytical cross-sectional study consisted of all fourth-year undergraduate students of audiology and occupational therapy. After implementation of the online grand round, the satisfaction questionnaire and knowledge exam were completed by the students.Results The level of satisfaction in both groups was above average (average>3); however, there was a significant difference in the mean total score of satisfaction questionnaire between the two groups (P=0.00). The mean score of the knowledge exam was 6.46±1.59 and 6.28±1.89 in the audiology and occupational therapy groups, respectively. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the mean score of this exam between the two groups (P=0.78).Conclusion The online grand round can play an effective role in transferring the teacher's experiences to students during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it is not possible to hold face-to-face classes.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间阿瓦士君迪沙普尔医科大学听力学和职业治疗专业学生在线实地培训效果的评估和比较
本研究旨在探讨和比较2019冠状病毒病大流行期间阿瓦兹·君迪普尔医科大学(AJUMS)学生听力学和职业治疗两组在线地面治疗的有效性。方法本分析性横断面研究的研究对象为所有听力学和职业治疗专业的四年级本科生。在线大回合实施后,由学生完成满意度问卷和知识测试。结果两组患者的满意度均高于平均水平(平均bb0.3);两组患者满意度问卷平均总分差异有统计学意义(P=0.00)。听力学组和职业治疗组知识测验的平均分分别为6.46±1.59分和6.28±1.89分。然而,两组的平均得分无显著差异(P=0.78)。结论在新冠肺炎大流行期间,在无法进行面对面授课的情况下,在线大讲堂可以有效地将教师的经验传授给学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信