A Misunderstood Passage and an Unnecessary Deletion in Aeneid 11.399–409

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/722561
S. Casali
{"title":"A Misunderstood Passage and an Unnecessary Deletion in Aeneid 11.399–409","authors":"S. Casali","doi":"10.1086/722561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note deals with a difficult passage from the speech that Turnus gives to the Italian council in Aeneid 11. In lines 378–409 Turnus replies to Drances’ speech, but the relevance of 403–5 to his argument is not immediately clear. Accordingly, there is currently a consensus among editors and commentators, in whose opinion line 404 should be deleted. This note attempts to demonstrate that the deletion of 404 is not necessary, and that the current consensus interpretation of 403–5 is unsatisfactory.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note deals with a difficult passage from the speech that Turnus gives to the Italian council in Aeneid 11. In lines 378–409 Turnus replies to Drances’ speech, but the relevance of 403–5 to his argument is not immediately clear. Accordingly, there is currently a consensus among editors and commentators, in whose opinion line 404 should be deleted. This note attempts to demonstrate that the deletion of 404 is not necessary, and that the current consensus interpretation of 403–5 is unsatisfactory.
《埃涅阿斯纪》11.399–409中的一段误解和不必要的删除
这封信讲述了特努斯在《埃涅阿斯纪11》中向意大利议会发表的演讲中的一段艰难的段落。在第378–409行中,Turnus回复了Drance的演讲,但403–5与他的论点的相关性尚不清楚。因此,目前编辑和评论员之间达成了共识,他们的意见线404应该删除。本说明试图证明删除404是不必要的,并且目前对403-5的共识解释是不令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信