Open Data and Open Access Articles: Exploring Connections in the Life Sciences

Sarah C. Williams
{"title":"Open Data and Open Access Articles: Exploring Connections in the Life Sciences","authors":"Sarah C. Williams","doi":"10.7191/jeslib.2020.1184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This small-scale study explores the current state of connections between open data and open access (OA) articles in the life sciences. Methods: This study involved 44 openly available life sciences datasets from the Illinois Data Bank that had 45 related research articles. For each article, I gathered the OA status of the journal and the article on the publisher website and checked whether the article was openly available via Unpaywall and Research Gate. I also examined how and where the open data was included in the HTML and PDF versions of the related articles. Results: Of the 45 articles studied, less than half were published in Gold/Full OA journals, and while the remaining articles were published in Gold/Hybrid journals, none of them were OA. This study found that OA articles pointed to the Illinois Data Bank datasets similarly to all of the related articles, most commonly with a data availability statement containing a DOI. Conclusions: The findings indicate that Gold OA in hybrid journals does not appear to be a popular option, even for articles connected to open data, and this study emphasizes the importance of data repositories providing DOIs, since the related articles frequently used DOIs to point to the Illinois Data Bank datasets. This study also revealed concerns about free (not licensed OA) access to articles on publisher websites, which will be a significant topic for future research.","PeriodicalId":90214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of escience librarianship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of escience librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2020.1184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This small-scale study explores the current state of connections between open data and open access (OA) articles in the life sciences. Methods: This study involved 44 openly available life sciences datasets from the Illinois Data Bank that had 45 related research articles. For each article, I gathered the OA status of the journal and the article on the publisher website and checked whether the article was openly available via Unpaywall and Research Gate. I also examined how and where the open data was included in the HTML and PDF versions of the related articles. Results: Of the 45 articles studied, less than half were published in Gold/Full OA journals, and while the remaining articles were published in Gold/Hybrid journals, none of them were OA. This study found that OA articles pointed to the Illinois Data Bank datasets similarly to all of the related articles, most commonly with a data availability statement containing a DOI. Conclusions: The findings indicate that Gold OA in hybrid journals does not appear to be a popular option, even for articles connected to open data, and this study emphasizes the importance of data repositories providing DOIs, since the related articles frequently used DOIs to point to the Illinois Data Bank datasets. This study also revealed concerns about free (not licensed OA) access to articles on publisher websites, which will be a significant topic for future research.
开放数据和开放获取文章:探索生命科学中的联系
目的:这项小规模研究探讨了生命科学中开放数据和开放获取(OA)文章之间联系的现状。方法:本研究涉及来自伊利诺伊州数据库的44个公开获取的生命科学数据集,其中包含45篇相关研究文章。对于每一篇文章,我收集了该期刊和该文章在出版商网站上的开放获取状态,并检查该文章是否可以通过Unpaywall和Research Gate公开获取。我还研究了在相关文章的HTML和PDF版本中如何以及在何处包含开放数据。结果:在研究的45篇文章中,不到一半的文章发表在Gold/Full OA期刊上,而其余的文章发表在Gold/Hybrid期刊上,没有一篇是OA。该研究发现,OA文章指向Illinois Data Bank数据集的方式与所有相关文章相似,最常见的是带有包含DOI的数据可用性声明。结论:研究结果表明,混合期刊中的黄金OA似乎不是一个受欢迎的选择,即使是与开放数据相关的文章,本研究强调了提供doi的数据存储库的重要性,因为相关文章经常使用doi指向伊利诺斯数据银行数据集。这项研究还揭示了人们对出版商网站上文章的免费(非授权开放获取)访问的担忧,这将是未来研究的一个重要主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信