A polifonia processual e a vulnerabilidade dialógica no sistema judicial brasileiro

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Henriete Karam, G. Avelar
{"title":"A polifonia processual e a vulnerabilidade dialógica no sistema judicial brasileiro","authors":"Henriete Karam, G. Avelar","doi":"10.4013/rechtd.2019.112.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present interdisciplinary article has been the main aim, approaching the Brazilian procedural system using the dialogism and polyphony concepts developed by Mikhail Bakhtin in the linguistic and literary studies fields, and having as goals the dialogic nature of language and the polyphonic and narrative character of the judicial process, the matter intrinsically related to the contradictory constitutional principles satisfaction, the large defense and the isonomy which ensures that process dialectical and parity conduction. Through the concrete situations essay extracted from the current Brazilian context, it is evident how the procedural participation which should have repercussion in the processual construction through the various voices that dialogue, it is being suppressed by a single voice imposition that despises the others, resulting materially in the procedural monophony. It is concluded that in order to have effective procedural polyphony, it is necessary the judicial decision is rightly justified, in order to consider and appreciating all the troubles brought forward in the case, so as to give concrete expression to the constitutional principle of justification of judicial procedures.","PeriodicalId":53186,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2019.112.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present interdisciplinary article has been the main aim, approaching the Brazilian procedural system using the dialogism and polyphony concepts developed by Mikhail Bakhtin in the linguistic and literary studies fields, and having as goals the dialogic nature of language and the polyphonic and narrative character of the judicial process, the matter intrinsically related to the contradictory constitutional principles satisfaction, the large defense and the isonomy which ensures that process dialectical and parity conduction. Through the concrete situations essay extracted from the current Brazilian context, it is evident how the procedural participation which should have repercussion in the processual construction through the various voices that dialogue, it is being suppressed by a single voice imposition that despises the others, resulting materially in the procedural monophony. It is concluded that in order to have effective procedural polyphony, it is necessary the judicial decision is rightly justified, in order to consider and appreciating all the troubles brought forward in the case, so as to give concrete expression to the constitutional principle of justification of judicial procedures.
巴西司法系统的程序复调和对话脆弱性
目前这篇跨学科文章的主要目的是,利用米哈伊尔·巴赫金在语言学和文学研究领域发展的对话和复调概念来研究巴西的程序系统,并以语言的对话性质和司法过程的复调和叙事特征为目标,这一问题本质上与矛盾的宪法原则的满足有关,大防御和均等化保证了过程的辩证和均等化传导。通过从当前巴西背景中提取的具体情况,很明显,程序性参与应该通过对话的各种声音在程序建设中产生影响,但它被一种蔑视其他声音的单一声音所压制,从而在实质上造成了程序上的单一声音。本文认为,为了实现有效的程序复调,必须对司法判决进行正当的辩护,以考虑和欣赏案件中提出的各种麻烦,从而具体体现宪法规定的司法程序正当原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) is published by UNISINOS three times a year and it aims to publish original research papers, articles for discussion and book reviews in the following areas: Hermeneutics, Constitution and Realization of Rights; Society, New Rights and Transnationalization. The articles or unpublished papers will be published in the language they were submitted and will be evaluated by at least two reviewers using the double blind review system. In other words, during the evaluation process the author’s name will not be revealed to the referees and neither the referees’ names will be revealed to the author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信