{"title":"Comparison between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures","authors":"Ruixia Zhu, Gongyin Zhao, Liangliang Wang, Shijie Jiang, Nanwei Xu, Jiao Xiaojun, Yuji Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the efficacy of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PA) in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nA retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 67 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to December 2017. There were 25 males and 42 females, aged 60-90 years [(76.1±7.6)years]. There were 31 patients with right femoral neck fracture and 36 with left femoral neck fracture, all of whom underwent operations within 72 hours after injury. There were 18 patients with type III and 49 with type IV according to Garden typing. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Direct anterior approach (DAA) was performed in 36 patients (DAA group) and posterior approach (PA) was performed in 31 patients (PA group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss, total blood loss, the time when the patients got out of bed, and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint function one month after operation. The complications of the two groups were recorded. \n \n \nResults \nAll patients were followed up for 3-6 weeks, with an average of one month. The operation time of DAA group was longer than that of PA group [(75.0±10.5)minutes vs. (54.0±11.4)minutes] (P 0.05). DAA group had shorter durations in terms of the time when patients got out of bed [(23.7±18.1)hours vs. (35.1±22.5)hours] (P 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included femoral periprosthetic fracture in three patients, lateral femoral nerve injury in two patients and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion in two patients in DAA group. In the PA group, there was one patient with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity at one month after operation, two patients with posterior dislocation of the hip, four patients with periprosthetic fracture and four patients with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nFor femoral neck fracture in the elderly, compared with PA hip arthroplasty, DAA hip arthroplasty has less bleeding, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay, with satisfactory short-term results. \n \n \nKey words: \nFemoral neck fractures; Hip arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Recessive blood loss","PeriodicalId":10161,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"730-735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-8050.2019.08.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the efficacy of direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PA) in hip arthroplasty for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures.
Methods
A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 67 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Second People's Hospital of Changzhou City, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from July 2015 to December 2017. There were 25 males and 42 females, aged 60-90 years [(76.1±7.6)years]. There were 31 patients with right femoral neck fracture and 36 with left femoral neck fracture, all of whom underwent operations within 72 hours after injury. There were 18 patients with type III and 49 with type IV according to Garden typing. All patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty. Direct anterior approach (DAA) was performed in 36 patients (DAA group) and posterior approach (PA) was performed in 31 patients (PA group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, recessive blood loss, total blood loss, the time when the patients got out of bed, and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score were used to evaluate hip joint function one month after operation. The complications of the two groups were recorded.
Results
All patients were followed up for 3-6 weeks, with an average of one month. The operation time of DAA group was longer than that of PA group [(75.0±10.5)minutes vs. (54.0±11.4)minutes] (P 0.05). DAA group had shorter durations in terms of the time when patients got out of bed [(23.7±18.1)hours vs. (35.1±22.5)hours] (P 0.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications included femoral periprosthetic fracture in three patients, lateral femoral nerve injury in two patients and severe anemia requiring blood transfusion in two patients in DAA group. In the PA group, there was one patient with deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity at one month after operation, two patients with posterior dislocation of the hip, four patients with periprosthetic fracture and four patients with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion (P>0.05).
Conclusion
For femoral neck fracture in the elderly, compared with PA hip arthroplasty, DAA hip arthroplasty has less bleeding, earlier time to get out of bed and shorter hospital stay, with satisfactory short-term results.
Key words:
Femoral neck fractures; Hip arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Recessive blood loss
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Trauma (International Standard Serial Publication Number: ISSN 1001-8050, Domestic Uniform Serial Publication Number: CN 50-1098/R) was founded in September 1985, which is the only high-level medical professional academic journal that can comprehensively and systematically reflect the achievements and development trends of China's traumatology medicine, and has a wide academic influence in China's traumatology medicine community. It has a wide range of academic influence in China's trauma medicine.
Chinese Journal of Trauma is a source journal of China Science and Technology Paper Statistics, a source journal of China Science Citation Database (CSCD), a core journal of China Comprehensive Medicine and Health Care, a source journal of China Academic Journals Comprehensive Evaluation Database (CAJCED), a full-text journal of China Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), a core academic journal of China Center for Scientific Evaluation (RCCSE), a core academic journal of China Traumatology and Traumatology Center (CTC), a core academic journal of China Traumatology Center (RCCSE). RCCSE) core academic journals; Chinese Biomedical Journal Database (CMCC), Chinese Biomedical Journal Citation Database (CBJCED), China Journal Network (CJN), China Academic Journals (CD-ROM), Chinese Academic Journals Abstracts (Chinese Edition), Chemical Abstracts of the United States (CA), Index Copernicus of Poland (IC), and Japan Institute of Science and Technology Database (JICST), World Health Organization Western Pacific Region Medical Search (WPRIM) and Russian Journal of Abstracts (ΡЖ) included journals.