Understanding critical thinking: A comparative analysis between university students’ and teachers’ conception

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Bezanilla, Héctor Galindo-Domínguez, Lucía Campo, Donna Fernández-Nogueira, Manuel Poblete Ruiz
{"title":"Understanding critical thinking: A comparative analysis between university students’ and teachers’ conception","authors":"M. Bezanilla, Héctor Galindo-Domínguez, Lucía Campo, Donna Fernández-Nogueira, Manuel Poblete Ruiz","doi":"10.18543/tjhe.2515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking is a key competence in higher education. However, little is known about the conception that students have of this competence. This study aims to analyze what university students understand by critical thinking and if these conceptions agree with those of university teachers analyzed in a previous study. A total of 263 participants took part in the study. The findings reveal that students tend to consider critical thinking as a competence related to reasoning/arguing and questioning/asking oneself. Also, that students’ conception about critical thinking differs from that of teachers. Whereas students tend to consider critical thinking as related to reasoning/arguing, questioning/asking oneself and, to a lesser extent, to acting/compromising. Teachers, on the other hand, tend to consider critical thinking as related to analyzing/organizing and evaluating. No significant differences were found regarding students’ gender and academic year. These results highlight the importance of considering students’ views when designing the curricula and the learning activities to develop students’ critical thinking. \nReceived: 30 June 2022Accepted: 6 March 2023","PeriodicalId":53788,"journal":{"name":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Critical thinking is a key competence in higher education. However, little is known about the conception that students have of this competence. This study aims to analyze what university students understand by critical thinking and if these conceptions agree with those of university teachers analyzed in a previous study. A total of 263 participants took part in the study. The findings reveal that students tend to consider critical thinking as a competence related to reasoning/arguing and questioning/asking oneself. Also, that students’ conception about critical thinking differs from that of teachers. Whereas students tend to consider critical thinking as related to reasoning/arguing, questioning/asking oneself and, to a lesser extent, to acting/compromising. Teachers, on the other hand, tend to consider critical thinking as related to analyzing/organizing and evaluating. No significant differences were found regarding students’ gender and academic year. These results highlight the importance of considering students’ views when designing the curricula and the learning activities to develop students’ critical thinking. Received: 30 June 2022Accepted: 6 March 2023
理解批判性思维:大学生与教师观念的比较分析
批判性思维是高等教育的关键能力。然而,人们对学生具备这种能力的概念知之甚少。本研究旨在分析大学生通过批判性思维理解的内容,以及这些概念是否与之前研究中分析的大学教师的概念一致。共有263名参与者参与了这项研究。研究结果表明,学生倾向于将批判性思维视为一种与推理/争论和提问/自问有关的能力。此外,学生对批判性思维的概念与教师的不同。而学生们倾向于认为批判性思维与推理/争论、质疑/自问有关,在较小程度上与行动/妥协有关。另一方面,教师往往认为批判性思维与分析/组织和评估有关。在学生的性别和学年方面没有发现显著差异。这些结果强调了在设计课程和学习活动时考虑学生观点的重要性,以培养学生的批判性思维。收到日期:2022年6月30日接受日期:2023年3月6日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Tuning Journal for Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信