Implementing England’s Care Act 2014: was the Act a success and when will we know?

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Emily Burn, Sam Redgate, Catherine Needham, Stephen Peckham
{"title":"Implementing England’s Care Act 2014: was the Act a success and when will we know?","authors":"Emily Burn, Sam Redgate, Catherine Needham, Stephen Peckham","doi":"10.1332/239788221x16916503736939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries are reforming long-term care to deal with the social risks created by demographic and social change. However, the passage of legislation is often followed by a new set of challenges as policy is implemented. This article examines England’s Care Act 2014 through Compton and ‘t Hart’s criteria of policy endurance to demonstrate the importance of assessing effectiveness at multiple time points. Early success in ‘implementation readiness’ was followed by the abandonment or dilution of key commitments. Yet, the Act’s foundational principles – well-being, prevention and capping private spending – continue to shape care policy, much as its original supporters hoped.","PeriodicalId":43660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care and Caring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care and Caring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221x16916503736939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries are reforming long-term care to deal with the social risks created by demographic and social change. However, the passage of legislation is often followed by a new set of challenges as policy is implemented. This article examines England’s Care Act 2014 through Compton and ‘t Hart’s criteria of policy endurance to demonstrate the importance of assessing effectiveness at multiple time points. Early success in ‘implementation readiness’ was followed by the abandonment or dilution of key commitments. Yet, the Act’s foundational principles – well-being, prevention and capping private spending – continue to shape care policy, much as its original supporters hoped.
实施2014年英格兰护理法案:该法案成功了吗?我们什么时候才能知道?
许多国家正在改革长期护理,以应对人口和社会变化带来的社会风险。然而,随着政策的实施,立法通过后往往会面临一系列新的挑战。本文通过康普顿和哈特的政策承受能力标准考察了英格兰的《2014年护理法》,以证明在多个时间点评估有效性的重要性。在“执行准备就绪”方面取得早期成功之后,关键承诺被放弃或淡化。然而,正如该法案最初的支持者所希望的那样,该法案的基本原则——福利、预防和限制私人支出——继续塑造着护理政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Care and Caring
International Journal of Care and Caring SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信