Comparative analysis of interest rate term structures in the Solvency II environment

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mariano González Sánchez, S. Rodriguez-Sanchez
{"title":"Comparative analysis of interest rate term structures in the Solvency II environment","authors":"Mariano González Sánchez, S. Rodriguez-Sanchez","doi":"10.1108/JRF-04-2020-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSolvency-II is the current regulatory framework of insurance companies in the European Union. Under this standard, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA), as a regulatory board, has established that the Smith–Wilson (SW) model can be used as the model to estimate interest rate curve. This paper aims to analyze whether this model adjusts to the market curve better than Nelson–Siegel (NS) and whether the values set for the parameters are adequate.Design/methodology/approachThis empirical study analyzes whether the SW interest rate curve shows lower root mean squared errors than the NS curve for a sample of daily prices of Spanish Government bonds between 2014 and 2019.FindingsThe results indicate that NS adjusts the market data better, the parameters recommended by the EIOPA correspond to the maximum values observed in the sample period and the current recommended curve for insurance companies underestimates company operations.Originality/valueThis paper verifies that the criterion of the last liquid point does not allow for selecting an optimal sample to adjust the curve and criteria based on prices without arbitrage opportunities are more appropriate.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-04-2020-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSolvency-II is the current regulatory framework of insurance companies in the European Union. Under this standard, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA), as a regulatory board, has established that the Smith–Wilson (SW) model can be used as the model to estimate interest rate curve. This paper aims to analyze whether this model adjusts to the market curve better than Nelson–Siegel (NS) and whether the values set for the parameters are adequate.Design/methodology/approachThis empirical study analyzes whether the SW interest rate curve shows lower root mean squared errors than the NS curve for a sample of daily prices of Spanish Government bonds between 2014 and 2019.FindingsThe results indicate that NS adjusts the market data better, the parameters recommended by the EIOPA correspond to the maximum values observed in the sample period and the current recommended curve for insurance companies underestimates company operations.Originality/valueThis paper verifies that the criterion of the last liquid point does not allow for selecting an optimal sample to adjust the curve and criteria based on prices without arbitrage opportunities are more appropriate.
偿付能力II环境下利率期限结构的比较分析
目的Solvency II是欧盟保险公司目前的监管框架。根据这一标准,欧洲保险和职业养老金管理局(EIOPA)作为监管委员会,已经确定可以使用Smith–Wilson(SW)模型作为估计利率曲线的模型。本文旨在分析该模型是否比Nelson–Siegel(NS)更好地适应市场曲线,以及为参数设置的值是否足够。设计/方法/方法本实证研究分析了2014年至2019年西班牙政府债券日价格样本的SW利率曲线是否显示出比NS曲线更低的均方根误差。结果表明,NS更好地调整了市场数据,EIOPA推荐的参数对应于样本期内观察到的最大值,而保险公司目前的推荐曲线低估了公司运营。原创性/价值本文验证了最后一个流动点的标准不允许选择最优样本来调整曲线,而基于没有套利机会的价格的标准更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信