Stepping Up to the Plate: Minor Leaguers Attempt to Remedy their Unconscionable Plight

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 BUSINESS
Lucas W. Loafman, John T. Holden
{"title":"Stepping Up to the Plate: Minor Leaguers Attempt to Remedy their Unconscionable Plight","authors":"Lucas W. Loafman,&nbsp;John T. Holden","doi":"10.1111/ablj.12223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Professional baseball players are often thought of as making multi-million-dollar salaries, but most professional baseball players have recently made under $15,000 a year. Minor league players toiled under an onerous system resulting from baseball's judicially created antitrust exemption and lobbying efforts that exempted them from minimum wage and overtime. These factors allowed teams to impose a uniform player contract (UPC) on players with numerous unconscionable provisions for years. However, a late-night Tweet in August of 2022 sent shockwaves through the sports and labor world, announcing that the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) was sending out authorization cards to represent minor league players. After years of fighting to maintain the authority to impose conditions on minor league players, through lobbying and litigation, Major League Baseball (MLB) turned over a new leaf and recognized the unionization of minor league players under the MLBPA less than three weeks later. In light of this long sought-after recognition, this article takes a novel approach. First, it provides historical context for baseball's unique ability to impose working conditions on minor leaguers without significant concern for legal ramifications. Second, it provides an overview of the doctrine of contractual unconscionability and analyzes the prior UPC as an unconscionable agreement. Finally, it details the historic unionization process and makes detailed recommendations to ameliorate the unconscionable conditions minor league players have faced when they negotiate with MLB owners to draft their initial collective bargaining agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54186,"journal":{"name":"American Business Law Journal","volume":"60 2","pages":"289-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ablj.12223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional baseball players are often thought of as making multi-million-dollar salaries, but most professional baseball players have recently made under $15,000 a year. Minor league players toiled under an onerous system resulting from baseball's judicially created antitrust exemption and lobbying efforts that exempted them from minimum wage and overtime. These factors allowed teams to impose a uniform player contract (UPC) on players with numerous unconscionable provisions for years. However, a late-night Tweet in August of 2022 sent shockwaves through the sports and labor world, announcing that the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) was sending out authorization cards to represent minor league players. After years of fighting to maintain the authority to impose conditions on minor league players, through lobbying and litigation, Major League Baseball (MLB) turned over a new leaf and recognized the unionization of minor league players under the MLBPA less than three weeks later. In light of this long sought-after recognition, this article takes a novel approach. First, it provides historical context for baseball's unique ability to impose working conditions on minor leaguers without significant concern for legal ramifications. Second, it provides an overview of the doctrine of contractual unconscionability and analyzes the prior UPC as an unconscionable agreement. Finally, it details the historic unionization process and makes detailed recommendations to ameliorate the unconscionable conditions minor league players have faced when they negotiate with MLB owners to draft their initial collective bargaining agreement.

迈向本垒板:小联盟球员试图弥补他们不合理的困境
职业棒球运动员通常被认为年薪数百万美元,但大多数职业棒球运动员最近的年薪不到1.5万美元。小联盟的球员在一个繁重的制度下辛苦劳作,这是由棒球司法创造的反垄断豁免和游说努力造成的,这些努力使他们免于最低工资和加班费。这些因素使得球队多年来在球员身上强加了一份统一球员合同(UPC),其中有许多不合情理的条款。但是,在2022年8月的深夜,美国职业棒球大联盟(MLBPA)在推特上宣布,美国职业棒球大联盟(MLBPA)将向小联盟球员发放授权卡,这一消息在体育界和劳动界引起了轩然大波。通过游说和诉讼,美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)多年来一直在努力维持对小联盟球员施加条件的权力,不到三周后,美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)就翻开了新的一页,在MLBPA下承认了小联盟球员的工会组织。鉴于这一长期追求的认可,本文采用了一种新颖的方法。首先,它为棒球的独特能力提供了历史背景,即在没有重大法律后果的情况下对小联盟球员施加工作条件。其次,概述了合同不合理原则,并分析了在先UPC作为不合理协议的情况。最后,它详细介绍了历史性的工会化过程,并提出了详细的建议,以改善小联盟球员在与MLB老板谈判起草最初的集体谈判协议时所面临的不合理条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The ABLJ is a faculty-edited, double blind peer reviewed journal, continuously published since 1963. Our mission is to publish only top quality law review articles that make a scholarly contribution to all areas of law that impact business theory and practice. We search for those articles that articulate a novel research question and make a meaningful contribution directly relevant to scholars and practitioners of business law. The blind peer review process means legal scholars well-versed in the relevant specialty area have determined selected articles are original, thorough, important, and timely. Faculty editors assure the authors’ contribution to scholarship is evident. We aim to elevate legal scholarship and inform responsible business decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信