Factors Associated With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Severity in Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study

Ida Mohammadi, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Roozbeh Tavanaei, M. Golmohammadi, A. Zali, S. Oraee-Yazdani
{"title":"Factors Associated With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Severity in Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Ida Mohammadi, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Roozbeh Tavanaei, M. Golmohammadi, A. Zali, S. Oraee-Yazdani","doi":"10.34172/icnj.2021.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major life limiting issue for many patients. However, studies detailing the factors contributing to bowel problems are scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the associations between different aspects of bowel problems and characteristics of SCI, such as time since injury (TSI), level of injury (LOI), and the cause of injury. Methods: Two questionnaires (the NBD score questionnaire and the Cleveland clinic constipation system score questionnaire) were administered to complete, traumatic patients with SCI that matched the designated criteria. The total scores and the subscales were then regressed to TSI and LOI, and the distribution patterns of NBD score severity according to LOI and cause of injury were shown in a diagram. Results: Within the subscales of the NBD score, frequency of defecation, digital stimulation or evacuation of the anorectum, and perianal skin problems were all significantly and positively correlated with the TSI, yet the frequency of fecal incontinence was negatively associated with this variable. Moreover, uneasiness, headache, or perspiration during defecation and regular use of drops against constipation were negatively associated with the LOI. In the diagrams, patterns of NBD score severity were similar according to LOI, but visibly differed according to cause. With respect to the CCCS score (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System), the score itself was shown to be positively associated with TSI. Within the subscales, difficulty, time spent in lavatory, and duration of constipation were positively correlated with TSI. Furthermore, type of assistance was negatively associated with the LOI. Conclusion: Different characteristics of SCI, TSI, LOI, and cause, each are significantly and distinctly associated with different aspects of the bowel problems that patients with SCI face.","PeriodicalId":33222,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/icnj.2021.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major life limiting issue for many patients. However, studies detailing the factors contributing to bowel problems are scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the associations between different aspects of bowel problems and characteristics of SCI, such as time since injury (TSI), level of injury (LOI), and the cause of injury. Methods: Two questionnaires (the NBD score questionnaire and the Cleveland clinic constipation system score questionnaire) were administered to complete, traumatic patients with SCI that matched the designated criteria. The total scores and the subscales were then regressed to TSI and LOI, and the distribution patterns of NBD score severity according to LOI and cause of injury were shown in a diagram. Results: Within the subscales of the NBD score, frequency of defecation, digital stimulation or evacuation of the anorectum, and perianal skin problems were all significantly and positively correlated with the TSI, yet the frequency of fecal incontinence was negatively associated with this variable. Moreover, uneasiness, headache, or perspiration during defecation and regular use of drops against constipation were negatively associated with the LOI. In the diagrams, patterns of NBD score severity were similar according to LOI, but visibly differed according to cause. With respect to the CCCS score (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System), the score itself was shown to be positively associated with TSI. Within the subscales, difficulty, time spent in lavatory, and duration of constipation were positively correlated with TSI. Furthermore, type of assistance was negatively associated with the LOI. Conclusion: Different characteristics of SCI, TSI, LOI, and cause, each are significantly and distinctly associated with different aspects of the bowel problems that patients with SCI face.
脊髓损伤中神经源性肠功能障碍严重程度的相关因素:一项横断面研究
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)引起的神经源性肠功能障碍(NBD)是许多患者的主要生命限制问题。然而,详细说明导致肠道问题的因素的研究很少。这项基于横断面问卷的研究的目的是评估肠道问题的不同方面与SCI特征之间的关系,如损伤后时间(TSI)、损伤程度(LOI)和损伤原因。方法:对符合指定标准的完整创伤SCI患者进行两份问卷调查(NBD评分问卷和克利夫兰临床便秘系统评分问卷)。然后将总分和分量表回归到TSI和LOI,NBD评分严重程度根据LOI和损伤原因的分布模式如图所示。结果:在NBD评分的分量表中,排便频率、肛门直肠指刺激或排空以及肛周皮肤问题均与TSI呈显著正相关,但大便失禁频率与该变量呈负相关。此外,排便时的不安、头痛或出汗以及经常使用滴剂治疗便秘与LOI呈负相关。在图表中,根据LOI,NBD评分严重程度的模式相似,但根据原因明显不同。关于CCCS评分(克利夫兰诊所便秘评分系统),该评分本身与TSI呈正相关。在分量表中,难度、如厕时间和便秘持续时间与TSI呈正相关。此外,援助类型与LOI呈负相关。结论:SCI的不同特征、TSI、LOI和病因,每一种都与SCI患者面临的肠道问题的不同方面有显著而明显的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信