Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Alert on Code Status Documentation for Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Q1 Nursing
Benjamin Switzer, Khalid A Jazieh, Eden Bernstein, David Harris
{"title":"Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Alert on Code Status Documentation for Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer.","authors":"Benjamin Switzer, Khalid A Jazieh, Eden Bernstein, David Harris","doi":"10.1200/JOP.19.00408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nCardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although advance care planning (ACP) in this population improves quality, patient satisfaction, hospice use, rates of harm, and health care costs, ACP documentation rates remain low. We observed changes in ACP documentation by internal medicine residents within a tertiary hospital's inpatient oncology service after a mandatory training module and enterprise-wide modification in electronic health medical records (EHMR).\n\n\nMETHODS\nFor patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic oncology service, this 16-week retrospective review observed resident code status (CS) documentation through admission notes and direct EHMR orders before and after implementation of an ACP training module and CS best practice alert (BPA). In addition, residents were surveyed on perceived barriers to CS documentation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn 535 unique admissions (244 before BPA, 291 after BPA), residents exhibited a 14.4% increase (from 47.1% to 61.5%) in admission note CS documentation and an 18.2% increase (from 12.7% to 30.9%) in CS orders at time of discharge. The most common self-reported barrier to ACP documentation was forgetting to discuss, with first-, second-, and third-year residents admitting to feeling uncomfortable in orchestrating ACP conversations at rates of 58%, 6%, and 5%, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nResident ACP documentation remains suboptimal in the high-risk cohort of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. However, rates seem to be positively influenced by online modules and EHMR-based interventions. Additional efforts to improve the current practice and culture of ACP remain a crucial aspect in the quality and safety of our approach to patient care.","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"JOP1900408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JOP.19.00408","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PURPOSE Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Although advance care planning (ACP) in this population improves quality, patient satisfaction, hospice use, rates of harm, and health care costs, ACP documentation rates remain low. We observed changes in ACP documentation by internal medicine residents within a tertiary hospital's inpatient oncology service after a mandatory training module and enterprise-wide modification in electronic health medical records (EHMR). METHODS For patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic oncology service, this 16-week retrospective review observed resident code status (CS) documentation through admission notes and direct EHMR orders before and after implementation of an ACP training module and CS best practice alert (BPA). In addition, residents were surveyed on perceived barriers to CS documentation. RESULTS In 535 unique admissions (244 before BPA, 291 after BPA), residents exhibited a 14.4% increase (from 47.1% to 61.5%) in admission note CS documentation and an 18.2% increase (from 12.7% to 30.9%) in CS orders at time of discharge. The most common self-reported barrier to ACP documentation was forgetting to discuss, with first-, second-, and third-year residents admitting to feeling uncomfortable in orchestrating ACP conversations at rates of 58%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Resident ACP documentation remains suboptimal in the high-risk cohort of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. However, rates seem to be positively influenced by online modules and EHMR-based interventions. Additional efforts to improve the current practice and culture of ACP remain a crucial aspect in the quality and safety of our approach to patient care.
电子病历警报对晚期癌症住院患者代码状态文档的影响。
目的:住院晚期癌症患者的心肺复苏与高发病率和死亡率相关。尽管预先护理计划(ACP)在这一人群中改善了质量、患者满意度、安宁疗护的使用、伤害率和医疗保健成本,但ACP记录率仍然很低。我们观察到,在强制性培训模块和企业范围内的电子健康医疗记录(EHMR)修改后,一家三级医院肿瘤住院服务内科住院医师的ACP记录发生了变化。方法:对于克利夫兰诊所肿瘤服务收治的患者,这项为期16周的回顾性研究在实施ACP培训模块和CS最佳实践警报(BPA)之前和之后,通过住院记录和直接EHMR订单观察住院代码状态(CS)文件。此外,还调查了居民对CS文件的感知障碍。结果535例住院患者中(BPA前244例,BPA后291例),住院患者在出院时的CS单增加了14.4%(从47.1%增加到61.5%),CS单增加了18.2%(从12.7%增加到30.9%)。ACP文件最常见的自我报告障碍是忘记讨论,第一,第二和第三年的住院医生承认在安排ACP对话时感到不舒服的比例分别为58%,6%和5%。结论:住院晚期癌症患者的ACP记录在高危队列中仍不理想。然而,比率似乎受到在线模块和基于ehmr的干预措施的积极影响。进一步努力改善ACP目前的实践和文化,仍然是我们对患者护理方法的质量和安全的关键方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信