Retained neuroprotection filter after stenting of the internal carotid artery

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
P. Myrcha, Dawid Siemieniuk, M. Kozak, D. Różański, T. Miłek, W. Woźniak, P. Ciostek
{"title":"Retained neuroprotection filter after stenting of the internal carotid artery","authors":"P. Myrcha, Dawid Siemieniuk, M. Kozak, D. Różański, T. Miłek, W. Woźniak, P. Ciostek","doi":"10.5603/aa.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retained neuroprotection filter after carotid stenting (CAS) is an extremely rare complication. We report the case of a 61-year old patient with an accidentally retained neuroprotection filter after urgent CAS. The patient did not consent to open surgical removal of the retained basket. We did not observe any flow disturbances in the filter and the patient remains asymptomatic in ten years follow-up. In some cases, the neuroprotection filter left in the internal carotid artery may not cause cerebral flow disturbances or occlusion of the stent. In case of the poor neurological or general condition of the patient, we can wait for its improvement or stenting.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2020.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Retained neuroprotection filter after carotid stenting (CAS) is an extremely rare complication. We report the case of a 61-year old patient with an accidentally retained neuroprotection filter after urgent CAS. The patient did not consent to open surgical removal of the retained basket. We did not observe any flow disturbances in the filter and the patient remains asymptomatic in ten years follow-up. In some cases, the neuroprotection filter left in the internal carotid artery may not cause cerebral flow disturbances or occlusion of the stent. In case of the poor neurological or general condition of the patient, we can wait for its improvement or stenting.
颈内动脉支架置入术后保留的神经保护过滤器
颈动脉支架术后保留神经保护过滤器(CAS)是一种极为罕见的并发症。我们报告了一例61岁的患者,在紧急CAS后意外保留了神经保护过滤器。患者不同意对保留的吊篮进行开放式手术切除。我们没有在过滤器中观察到任何流量紊乱,患者在十年的随访中仍然没有症状。在某些情况下,留在颈内动脉的神经保护过滤器可能不会导致脑血流紊乱或支架堵塞。如果患者的神经系统或全身状况不佳,我们可以等待其好转或支架植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Angiologica
Acta Angiologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Angiologica is a bilingual (Polish/English) quarterly for angiologists and vascular surgeons as well as for other doctors interested in vascular disorders. Original papers, reviews, case reports and letters submitted by authors from different countries, concerning physiology, pathology, presentation, diagnostics and treatment of vascular system, are published. Thorough contents of Acta Angiologica provide valuable information about modern diagnostic and therapeutic issues as well as advances in basic sciences and pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信