Peer Reviewed Articles: Understanding VAT in Three-Party, Platform-Based Business Models: Which Party Is Supplying Which Service?

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2022018
L. Zechner
{"title":"Peer Reviewed Articles: Understanding VAT in Three-Party, Platform-Based Business Models: Which Party Is Supplying Which Service?","authors":"L. Zechner","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three-party business models in which a platform operator intermediates between a supplier providing a service and a customer buying a service have become an important part of our daily lives. For purposes of European Value Added Tax (VAT), each transaction occurring as part of a three-party business model must be attributed to a ‘taxable’ person responsible for the VAT. Generally, suppliers may provide their services for VAT purposes as proprietary traders, undisclosed agents or disclosed agents, with varying VAT consequences. While there is little explicit case law specifying how to identify the two forms of agency, this article provides a framework for a distinction by building upon the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), taking into consideration the economic and commercial reality of each case and placing particular emphasis on the view of the average consumer. To contribute to a more uniform approach in attributing supplies in three-party, platform-based business models, specifically, this article develops indicators for assessing the relevant facts and ascertaining the economic reality of a case. Lastly, this article provides a method for differentiating agents from providers of electronically supplied services under current EU VAT law.\nEU VAT law, Attribution of services, Platform economy, Three-party business models, Disclosed agency, Undisclosed agency, Electronically supplied services, ECJ’s ‘economic approach, View of the average consumer, Uniform interpretation of VAT law","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-party business models in which a platform operator intermediates between a supplier providing a service and a customer buying a service have become an important part of our daily lives. For purposes of European Value Added Tax (VAT), each transaction occurring as part of a three-party business model must be attributed to a ‘taxable’ person responsible for the VAT. Generally, suppliers may provide their services for VAT purposes as proprietary traders, undisclosed agents or disclosed agents, with varying VAT consequences. While there is little explicit case law specifying how to identify the two forms of agency, this article provides a framework for a distinction by building upon the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), taking into consideration the economic and commercial reality of each case and placing particular emphasis on the view of the average consumer. To contribute to a more uniform approach in attributing supplies in three-party, platform-based business models, specifically, this article develops indicators for assessing the relevant facts and ascertaining the economic reality of a case. Lastly, this article provides a method for differentiating agents from providers of electronically supplied services under current EU VAT law. EU VAT law, Attribution of services, Platform economy, Three-party business models, Disclosed agency, Undisclosed agency, Electronically supplied services, ECJ’s ‘economic approach, View of the average consumer, Uniform interpretation of VAT law
同行评议文章:在三方平台商业模式下理解增值税:哪一方提供哪一种服务?
平台运营商在供应商提供服务和客户购买服务之间充当中介的三方商业模式已经成为我们日常生活的重要组成部分。就欧洲增值税(VAT)而言,作为三方商业模式一部分的每笔交易都必须归属于负责增值税的“应税”人员。一般来说,供应商可能以自营商、未披露代理人或披露代理人的身份为增值税目的提供服务,从而产生不同的增值税后果。虽然很少有明确的判例法规定如何识别这两种形式的代理,但本文以欧洲法院(ECJ)的判例法为基础,考虑到每个案例的经济和商业现实,并特别强调普通消费者的观点,为区分提供了一个框架。具体来说,为了在三方、基于平台的商业模式中提供更统一的供应商归属方法,本文开发了评估相关事实和确定案例经济现实的指标。最后,本文提供了一种在现行欧盟增值税法律下区分电子供应服务的代理商和供应商的方法。欧盟增值税法,服务属性,平台经济,三方商业模式,披露代理,未披露代理,电子提供的服务,欧洲法院的经济方法,普通消费者的视角,增值税法的统一解释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信