C. Dromard, Y. Bouchon-Navaro, M. Harmelin-Vivien, C. Bouchon
{"title":"The nutritional quality of non-calcified macroalgae in Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles) evaluated by their biochemical composition","authors":"C. Dromard, Y. Bouchon-Navaro, M. Harmelin-Vivien, C. Bouchon","doi":"10.18785/gcr.2801.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncor rected proof sNot fo r Distr ibutio n IntroductIon Climate change, marine pollution and overfishing on reef environments have led to an increasing colonization of macroalgae which compete with corals for space. This coral—algal phase shift is identified as a major threat for coral reefs (Hughes 1994). Cover and biomass of benthic macroalgae increase concurrently with coral loss, resulting in a shift from communities dominated by corals to communities dominated by macroalgae (Done 1992, McManus and Polsenberg 2004). This change has been attributed to an increasing input of nutrients in the ocean due to land—based pollution (agriculture, wastewater), a fragilization of the reef ecosystem due to climate changes (bleaching events, diseases) and the loss of major herbivorous organisms due to overfishing (Hughes 1994, McManus and Polsenberg 2004). Herbivorous fishes and urchins are key taxonomic groups to control and reverse this phenomenon (Bellwood et al. 2004, Ledlie et al. 2007). In the Caribbean, the principal herbivorous fishes are parrotfishes (Scaridae) and surgeonfishes (Acanthuridae). These groups are widely harvested and consumed in the whole region. Other herbivorous reef organisms are sea urchins, like Diadema antilarum. However, that species suffered from a massive mortality by epizootic disease between 1983 and 1984 (Lessios et al. 1984), leading to a severe depletion of their populations. Herbivorous fishes and sea urchins principally consume early life stages of macroalgae, maintaining an algal turf on coral reefs (Lubchenco and Gaines 1981, Burkepile and Hay 2010). With a loss of grazing pressure, macroalgae reach mature forms which are difficult to remove when established. Mature forms of macrolgae are generally avoided by herbivorous organisms due to their morphological and physiological strategies against herbivory such as calcification or synthesis of repellent molecules (Lubchenco and Gaines 1981, Norris and Fenical 1982, Lewis 1985, Hay 1991). Dietary behaviors of herbivorous fishes have been studied for a long time due to their ecological role in the regulation of macroalgae (Ogden and Lobel 1978, Lewis 1985). Several studies were conducted to determine food preferences of herbivorous fishes with direct observations in the field (McAfee and Morgan 1996, Kopp et al. 2010), experiments of cage exclusion (Burkepile and Hay 2011), feeding preferences assays using transplant experiments (Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007), gut content analyses (Randall 1967) or stable isotopes analyses (Plass—Johnson et al. 2013, Dromard et al. 2015). Some macroalgae are unanimously cited as preferred species for herbivorous fishes, like Acanthophora spicifera (Littler et al. 1983, Lewis 1986, Paul and Hay 1986) or Padina (Ogden 1976, Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007). Some species are differently consumed according to site or the phyla. For example, Laurencia spp. seems to be widely consumed by herbivorous fishes in Australia (Mantyka and Bellwood 2007), while this species appears to be avoided by fishes in the Caribbean (Ogden 1976). In the Caribbean, Laurencia is a preferred macroalgae for the queen conch Strombus gigas (Lapointe et al. 2004). Finally some macroalgae genera, such as Dictyota spp. and Caulerpa spp., seem to be avoided by herbivorous fishes (Paul and Hay 1986). Food preferences for herbivorous fishes can be explained by several factors, including algal structure, chemical defenses, and nutritional quality. It has been suggested that the probability of being eaten changes as a function of seaweed morphology. Indeed, filamentous algae and sheet—like algae are more likely to be consumed than calcareous macroalgae (Steneck and Watling 1982, Littler et al. 1983, Paul and Hay 1986, Hay 1991). Food choices can also be explained by the chemical defenses of macroalgae. Some species are able to synthetize repellent molecules, which deter herbivores and inhibit grazing by influencing their palatability (Paul and Hay 1986, Targett et al. 1986, Hay and Fenical 1988). Finally, THE NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF NON—CALCIFIED MACROALGAE IN GUADELOUPE (LESSER ANTILLES) EVALUATED BY THEIR BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION","PeriodicalId":36764,"journal":{"name":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.2801.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Uncor rected proof sNot fo r Distr ibutio n IntroductIon Climate change, marine pollution and overfishing on reef environments have led to an increasing colonization of macroalgae which compete with corals for space. This coral—algal phase shift is identified as a major threat for coral reefs (Hughes 1994). Cover and biomass of benthic macroalgae increase concurrently with coral loss, resulting in a shift from communities dominated by corals to communities dominated by macroalgae (Done 1992, McManus and Polsenberg 2004). This change has been attributed to an increasing input of nutrients in the ocean due to land—based pollution (agriculture, wastewater), a fragilization of the reef ecosystem due to climate changes (bleaching events, diseases) and the loss of major herbivorous organisms due to overfishing (Hughes 1994, McManus and Polsenberg 2004). Herbivorous fishes and urchins are key taxonomic groups to control and reverse this phenomenon (Bellwood et al. 2004, Ledlie et al. 2007). In the Caribbean, the principal herbivorous fishes are parrotfishes (Scaridae) and surgeonfishes (Acanthuridae). These groups are widely harvested and consumed in the whole region. Other herbivorous reef organisms are sea urchins, like Diadema antilarum. However, that species suffered from a massive mortality by epizootic disease between 1983 and 1984 (Lessios et al. 1984), leading to a severe depletion of their populations. Herbivorous fishes and sea urchins principally consume early life stages of macroalgae, maintaining an algal turf on coral reefs (Lubchenco and Gaines 1981, Burkepile and Hay 2010). With a loss of grazing pressure, macroalgae reach mature forms which are difficult to remove when established. Mature forms of macrolgae are generally avoided by herbivorous organisms due to their morphological and physiological strategies against herbivory such as calcification or synthesis of repellent molecules (Lubchenco and Gaines 1981, Norris and Fenical 1982, Lewis 1985, Hay 1991). Dietary behaviors of herbivorous fishes have been studied for a long time due to their ecological role in the regulation of macroalgae (Ogden and Lobel 1978, Lewis 1985). Several studies were conducted to determine food preferences of herbivorous fishes with direct observations in the field (McAfee and Morgan 1996, Kopp et al. 2010), experiments of cage exclusion (Burkepile and Hay 2011), feeding preferences assays using transplant experiments (Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007), gut content analyses (Randall 1967) or stable isotopes analyses (Plass—Johnson et al. 2013, Dromard et al. 2015). Some macroalgae are unanimously cited as preferred species for herbivorous fishes, like Acanthophora spicifera (Littler et al. 1983, Lewis 1986, Paul and Hay 1986) or Padina (Ogden 1976, Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007). Some species are differently consumed according to site or the phyla. For example, Laurencia spp. seems to be widely consumed by herbivorous fishes in Australia (Mantyka and Bellwood 2007), while this species appears to be avoided by fishes in the Caribbean (Ogden 1976). In the Caribbean, Laurencia is a preferred macroalgae for the queen conch Strombus gigas (Lapointe et al. 2004). Finally some macroalgae genera, such as Dictyota spp. and Caulerpa spp., seem to be avoided by herbivorous fishes (Paul and Hay 1986). Food preferences for herbivorous fishes can be explained by several factors, including algal structure, chemical defenses, and nutritional quality. It has been suggested that the probability of being eaten changes as a function of seaweed morphology. Indeed, filamentous algae and sheet—like algae are more likely to be consumed than calcareous macroalgae (Steneck and Watling 1982, Littler et al. 1983, Paul and Hay 1986, Hay 1991). Food choices can also be explained by the chemical defenses of macroalgae. Some species are able to synthetize repellent molecules, which deter herbivores and inhibit grazing by influencing their palatability (Paul and Hay 1986, Targett et al. 1986, Hay and Fenical 1988). Finally, THE NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF NON—CALCIFIED MACROALGAE IN GUADELOUPE (LESSER ANTILLES) EVALUATED BY THEIR BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION
气候变化、海洋污染和对珊瑚礁环境的过度捕捞导致大型藻类的殖民化增加,这些藻类与珊瑚竞争空间。这种珊瑚-藻类相移被认为是珊瑚礁的主要威胁(Hughes 1994)。底栖大型藻类的覆盖和生物量随着珊瑚的消失而增加,导致从珊瑚为主的群落向大型藻类为主的群落转变(Done 1992, McManus and Polsenberg 2004)。这一变化归因于陆地污染(农业、废水)导致海洋营养物质输入增加,气候变化(白化事件、疾病)导致珊瑚礁生态系统脆弱,以及过度捕捞导致主要食草生物丧失(Hughes 1994; McManus and Polsenberg 2004)。草食性鱼类和海胆是控制和扭转这一现象的关键分类群体(Bellwood et al. 2004, Ledlie et al. 2007)。在加勒比海,主要的草食性鱼类是鹦嘴鱼(刺尾鱼科)和刺尾鱼(刺尾鱼科)。这些群体在整个地区被广泛收获和消费。其他食草珊瑚礁生物是海胆,如Diadema antilarum。然而,该物种在1983年至1984年期间因动物流行病而大量死亡(Lessios et al. 1984),导致其种群严重减少。草食性鱼类和海胆主要消耗大型藻类的早期生命阶段,在珊瑚礁上维持藻类草皮(Lubchenco and Gaines 1981, Burkepile and Hay 2010)。随着放牧压力的丧失,大型藻类达到成熟形式,一旦建立就很难去除。成熟形式的巨足虫通常被食草生物所避免,因为它们的形态和生理策略对抗食草生物,如钙化或合成排斥分子(Lubchenco和Gaines 1981, Norris和Fenical 1982, Lewis 1985, Hay 1991)。由于草食性鱼类对大型藻类的生态调节作用,人们对其饮食行为进行了长期的研究(Ogden and Lobel 1978, Lewis 1985)。通过实地直接观察(McAfee and Morgan 1996, Kopp et al. 2010)、笼外排除实验(Burkepile and Hay 2011)、移植实验喂养偏好分析(Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007)、肠道含量分析(Randall 1967)或稳定同位素分析(plassa - johnson et al. 2013, Dromard et al. 2015),开展了几项研究,以确定草食性鱼类的食物偏好。一些大型藻类被一致认为是食草鱼类的首选物种,如棘藻(棘藻)(Littler et al. 1983, Lewis 1986, Paul and Hay 1986)或Padina (Ogden 1976, Lewis 1985, Paul and Hay 1986, Mantyka and Bellwood 2007)。有些种类根据地点或门的不同而消耗不同。例如,Laurencia spp.似乎被澳大利亚的食草鱼类广泛食用(Mantyka和Bellwood 2007),而该物种似乎被加勒比海的鱼类所避免(Ogden 1976)。在加勒比海,Laurencia是皇后螺Strombus gigas首选的大型藻类(Lapointe et al. 2004)。最后,一些大型藻类属,如Dictyota spp.和Caulerpa spp.,似乎是食草鱼类所避免的(Paul and Hay 1986)。草食性鱼类的食物偏好可以用几个因素来解释,包括藻类结构、化学防御和营养质量。有人认为,被吃掉的可能性随着海藻形态的变化而变化。事实上,丝状藻类和片状藻类比钙质大型藻类更容易被消耗(Steneck和Watling 1982, Littler等人1983,Paul和Hay 1986, Hay 1991)。食物的选择也可以用大型藻类的化学防御来解释。一些物种能够合成驱避分子,通过影响食草动物的适口性来阻止食草动物并抑制放牧(Paul and Hay 1986, Targett et al. 1986, Hay and Fenical 1988)。最后,对瓜德罗普岛(小安的列斯群岛)非钙化大型藻类的营养品质进行了生化成分评价