All roads lead to the thyroid gland: review of two popular “scarless” thyroidectomy approaches

Marissa Mencio, G. Fernández-Ranvier, W. Inabnet, H. Suh
{"title":"All roads lead to the thyroid gland: review of two popular “scarless” thyroidectomy approaches","authors":"Marissa Mencio, G. Fernández-Ranvier, W. Inabnet, H. Suh","doi":"10.21037/AOT-20-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thyroidectomy is the most common procedure performed in endocrine surgery. The standard surgical approach is via the anterior neck using a Kocher incision. Over the past two decades, minimally invasive and remote endoscopic approaches to thyroid surgery have emerged as surgeons attempt to improve the cosmesis of the surgery and move towards “scarless” approaches. Remote access techniques utilize strategically hidden incisions removed from the highly visible anterior neck. Rapidly emerging data shows these have comparable outcomes to the conventional open approach and result in high patient satisfaction and improved quality of life in thyroidectomy patients. The transoral endoscopic vestibular approach (TOETVA) and the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) are the two most common remote access approaches to date. In TOETVA, three incisions within the vestibular mucosa are used to access the thyroid. The use of standard laparoscopic instruments and a slightly less steep learning curve compared to other techniques have led to a successful adoption in North America. The robotic BABA technique uses 4 small, widely spaced incisions to provide ideal triangulation of instruments with a familiar midline view of the thyroid. Due to the robotic platform, it has a steeper learning curve but has seen great success in Asia. This article will review these two techniques, offering a comparison and highlighting the clinical trend and future","PeriodicalId":92168,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thyroid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOT-20-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thyroidectomy is the most common procedure performed in endocrine surgery. The standard surgical approach is via the anterior neck using a Kocher incision. Over the past two decades, minimally invasive and remote endoscopic approaches to thyroid surgery have emerged as surgeons attempt to improve the cosmesis of the surgery and move towards “scarless” approaches. Remote access techniques utilize strategically hidden incisions removed from the highly visible anterior neck. Rapidly emerging data shows these have comparable outcomes to the conventional open approach and result in high patient satisfaction and improved quality of life in thyroidectomy patients. The transoral endoscopic vestibular approach (TOETVA) and the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) are the two most common remote access approaches to date. In TOETVA, three incisions within the vestibular mucosa are used to access the thyroid. The use of standard laparoscopic instruments and a slightly less steep learning curve compared to other techniques have led to a successful adoption in North America. The robotic BABA technique uses 4 small, widely spaced incisions to provide ideal triangulation of instruments with a familiar midline view of the thyroid. Due to the robotic platform, it has a steeper learning curve but has seen great success in Asia. This article will review these two techniques, offering a comparison and highlighting the clinical trend and future
条条大路通甲状腺:回顾两种流行的“无疤痕”甲状腺切除术方法
甲状腺切除术是内分泌外科中最常见的手术。标准的手术方法是使用Kocher切口通过颈部前部。在过去的二十年里,随着外科医生试图改善手术的美容效果,并朝着“无疤痕”的方法迈进,微创和远程内窥镜甲状腺手术方法已经出现。远程访问技术利用从高度可见的前颈部切除的战略性隐藏切口。快速出现的数据显示,这些方法与传统的开放式方法具有可比的结果,并可提高甲状腺切除术患者的患者满意度和生活质量。经口内窥镜前庭入路(TOETVA)和机器人双侧腋窝-乳房入路(BABA)是迄今为止最常见的两种远程入路。在TOETVA中,前庭粘膜内的三个切口用于进入甲状腺。与其他技术相比,标准腹腔镜器械的使用和稍微不那么陡峭的学习曲线使其在北美得到了成功的采用。机器人BABA技术使用4个小而宽的切口,为仪器提供理想的三角测量,使其具有熟悉的甲状腺中线视图。由于机器人平台,它的学习曲线更陡峭,但在亚洲取得了巨大成功。这篇文章将回顾这两种技术,进行比较,并强调临床趋势和未来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信