Usporedba metoda samoprocjene i mjerenja visine, težine i indeksa tjelesne mase u turskoj studentskoj populaciji

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Sibel Önal, Sercan Acar, A. Özdemir, Cansev Meşe Yavuz, Seçil Sağir, Mehmet Sağir, Başak Özer
{"title":"Usporedba metoda samoprocjene i\nmjerenja visine, težine i indeksa tjelesne mase u turskoj studentskoj\npopulaciji","authors":"Sibel Önal, Sercan Acar, A. Özdemir, Cansev Meşe Yavuz, Seçil Sağir, Mehmet Sağir, Başak Özer","doi":"10.5671/ca.44.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accuracy and validity of self-reported height and weight, and body image satisfaction have not been evaluated particularly in young adult population in Turkey. The aim of the study was to establish the differences of self-reported height and weight, and body mass index (BMI). The study conducted on 617 university students (304 males and 313 females) aged 17-30 years from Ankara and Sivas, Turkey. Height and weight were measured and obtained by a questionnaire. From both measured and self-reported values for accuracy absolute differences were calculated. BMI was calculated from both self-reported and measured height and weight values using World Health Organization (WHO) cut-offs. The results showed that mean accuracy for the overestimated height was 1.83 cm for males (Ankara 1.59 cm and Sivas 2.05 cm), and 2.42 cm for females (Ankara 2.12 cm and Sivas 2.74 cm), and underreporting weight was 0.35 kg (Ankara 0.13 kg and Sivas 0.56 kg) and -0.95 kg (Ankara 0.33 kg and Sivas 1.07 kg), respectively. Self-reported BMIs>25 was 33.9% for males (Ankara 27.6% and Sivas 39.6%), and 15.7% for females (Ankara 9.9% and Sivas 16.8%), while measured BMIs>25 was 38.2% (Ankara 30.3% and Sivas 45.3%) and 25.9% (Ankara 21.7% and Sivas 35.5%), respectively. In conclusion, study group tended to overestimate height but underestimate weight, therefore the self-reported weight and height studies needed to evaluate more cautiously, and direct measurements or correction equations for adjustment needed for reliable results.","PeriodicalId":35544,"journal":{"name":"Collegium Antropologicum","volume":"44 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegium Antropologicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.44.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accuracy and validity of self-reported height and weight, and body image satisfaction have not been evaluated particularly in young adult population in Turkey. The aim of the study was to establish the differences of self-reported height and weight, and body mass index (BMI). The study conducted on 617 university students (304 males and 313 females) aged 17-30 years from Ankara and Sivas, Turkey. Height and weight were measured and obtained by a questionnaire. From both measured and self-reported values for accuracy absolute differences were calculated. BMI was calculated from both self-reported and measured height and weight values using World Health Organization (WHO) cut-offs. The results showed that mean accuracy for the overestimated height was 1.83 cm for males (Ankara 1.59 cm and Sivas 2.05 cm), and 2.42 cm for females (Ankara 2.12 cm and Sivas 2.74 cm), and underreporting weight was 0.35 kg (Ankara 0.13 kg and Sivas 0.56 kg) and -0.95 kg (Ankara 0.33 kg and Sivas 1.07 kg), respectively. Self-reported BMIs>25 was 33.9% for males (Ankara 27.6% and Sivas 39.6%), and 15.7% for females (Ankara 9.9% and Sivas 16.8%), while measured BMIs>25 was 38.2% (Ankara 30.3% and Sivas 45.3%) and 25.9% (Ankara 21.7% and Sivas 35.5%), respectively. In conclusion, study group tended to overestimate height but underestimate weight, therefore the self-reported weight and height studies needed to evaluate more cautiously, and direct measurements or correction equations for adjustment needed for reliable results.
提供土耳其学生群体身高、体重和体重指数的自我评估方法
自我报告的身高和体重的准确性和有效性以及身体形象满意度尚未得到评估,特别是在土耳其的年轻人中。该研究的目的是确定自我报告的身高、体重和身体质量指数(BMI)的差异。该研究对来自土耳其安卡拉和锡瓦斯的617名17-30岁的大学生(304名男性和313名女性)进行了研究。通过问卷测量身高和体重。从测量值和自我报告的准确性计算绝对差异。BMI是根据自我报告和测量的身高和体重值计算的,采用世界卫生组织(WHO)的截止值。结果表明,男性(安卡拉1.59 cm, Sivas 2.05 cm)和女性(安卡拉2.12 cm, Sivas 2.74 cm)身高高估的平均准确率分别为1.83 cm和2.42 cm,体重低估的平均准确率分别为0.35 kg(安卡拉0.13 kg, Sivas 0.56 kg)和-0.95 kg(安卡拉0.33 kg, Sivas 1.07 kg)。自我报告的bmi bbb25男性为33.9%(安卡拉27.6%,锡瓦斯39.6%),女性为15.7%(安卡拉9.9%,锡瓦斯16.8%),而测量的bmi bbb25分别为38.2%(安卡拉30.3%,锡瓦斯45.3%)和25.9%(安卡拉21.7%,锡瓦斯35.5%)。综上所述,研究组倾向于高估身高而低估体重,因此自我报告的体重和身高研究需要更加谨慎地评估,需要直接测量或校正方程进行调整以获得可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegium Antropologicum
Collegium Antropologicum Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International journal Collegium Antropologicum is the official journal of the Croatian Antropological Society and is jointly published by: Croatian Anthropological Society Croatian Association of Medical Anthropology - Croatian Medical Association Department of Natural Sciences, Anthropological Centre and the Scientific Council for Anthropological Research of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. With the numerous international recognition of co-operative experts, the Journal represents a relevant reference source in the fields of cultural and biological anthropology, sociology, ethnology, psychology, demography, history, archaeology, genetics, biomedicine, human ecology, nutrition and other fields related to multidisciplinary character of anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信