COVID-19: THE CHILD OF GLOBALISATION OR THE MOTHER OF DE-GLOBALISATION?

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
M. Svetličič
{"title":"COVID-19: THE CHILD OF GLOBALISATION OR\nTHE MOTHER OF DE-GLOBALISATION?","authors":"M. Svetličič","doi":"10.51936/tip.58.3.860-881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The objective of the article was to evaluate\nthe relationship between the Covid-19 pandemic and\nglobalisation (GLO) and de-globalisation (de-GLO) tendencies.\nBased on a theoretical evaluation of this relationship\nas well as historical development, it concludes\nthat Covid-19 is not the mother of de-GLO but its child,\nborn in a completely new global context facilitating the\npandemic. The roots of the pandemic’s conception are\nmore deeply embedded in the capitalist system, in its\nprincipal elements (market system, consumerist development\nmodel…). GLO as a global division of labour is\nnot over; the factors enhancing GLO are winning over\nthose slowing it down, provided that GLO becomes more\negalitarian and more human. A fully-fledged de-GLO\nwould be inefficient and painful. While the pandemic\nis not a black swan, it could have been predicted. Such\nan unprecedented crisis impersonated by the pandemic\nalso offers an opportunity to fundamentally rethink of\nour theories, way of life and development paradigm\nand, not the least, the whole system to be better prepared\nfor future similar crises.\nKeywords: Globalisation, de-globalisation, Covid-19,\ndevelopment model, anthropocentrism, system, history\nof GLO, future of GLO, post pandemic","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.58.3.860-881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. The objective of the article was to evaluate the relationship between the Covid-19 pandemic and globalisation (GLO) and de-globalisation (de-GLO) tendencies. Based on a theoretical evaluation of this relationship as well as historical development, it concludes that Covid-19 is not the mother of de-GLO but its child, born in a completely new global context facilitating the pandemic. The roots of the pandemic’s conception are more deeply embedded in the capitalist system, in its principal elements (market system, consumerist development model…). GLO as a global division of labour is not over; the factors enhancing GLO are winning over those slowing it down, provided that GLO becomes more egalitarian and more human. A fully-fledged de-GLO would be inefficient and painful. While the pandemic is not a black swan, it could have been predicted. Such an unprecedented crisis impersonated by the pandemic also offers an opportunity to fundamentally rethink of our theories, way of life and development paradigm and, not the least, the whole system to be better prepared for future similar crises. Keywords: Globalisation, de-globalisation, Covid-19, development model, anthropocentrism, system, history of GLO, future of GLO, post pandemic
新冠肺炎:全球化的孩子还是全球化的母亲?
摘要本文的目的是评估Covid-19大流行与全球化(GLO)和去全球化(de-GLO)趋势之间的关系。基于对这一关系的理论评估以及历史发展,报告得出结论:Covid-19不是全球疫情消除之母,而是疫情消除之子,它诞生在一个全新的全球背景下,为疫情大流行提供了便利。大流行概念的根源更深地植根于资本主义制度及其主要要素(市场制度、消费主义发展模式……)。全球劳工组织作为一个全球分工并没有结束;促进全球臭氧层变化的因素正在战胜减缓全球臭氧层变化的因素,前提是全球臭氧层变化变得更平等、更人性化。全面的去全球化将是低效和痛苦的。虽然这次大流行不是黑天鹅,但它是可以预测到的。这种由大流行病造成的前所未有的危机也提供了一个机会,从根本上重新思考我们的理论、生活方式和发展模式,尤其是整个系统,以便更好地为未来的类似危机做好准备。关键词:全球化、去全球化、Covid-19、发展模式、人类中心主义、体系、全球气候组织历史、未来、大流行后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信