Comparison of personas between two academic libraries

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Holt Zaugg, D. Ziegenfuss
{"title":"Comparison of personas between two academic libraries","authors":"Holt Zaugg, D. Ziegenfuss","doi":"10.1108/PMM-04-2018-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nA persona describes a group of library patrons as a single person to better identify and describe user patterns and needs. Identifying personas in academic libraries can assist in library planning by focusing on patrons. Initially, personas were thought to be unique to each library; additional insights led the researchers to rethink this assertion. The purpose of this paper is to determine if personas, developed in one library, are unique or more universal than previously thought.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, 903 surveys were completed across two institutions asking library patrons to identify use patterns within each library. Mean score responses were analyzed using an ANOVA, principal component analysis and RapidMiner technology. All analyses were used to identify personas with common interests and places personas in groups or neighborhoods.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings provide evidence for the universality of academic library personas. However, differences occur in how the personas are grouped and use different library services and resources.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPersonas allow librarians to view patrons in a more personal way as they connect personas to specific library spaces. While the personas appear to be universal, their interactions with each other depend on specific library amenities.\n","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PMM-04-2018-0013","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-04-2018-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose A persona describes a group of library patrons as a single person to better identify and describe user patterns and needs. Identifying personas in academic libraries can assist in library planning by focusing on patrons. Initially, personas were thought to be unique to each library; additional insights led the researchers to rethink this assertion. The purpose of this paper is to determine if personas, developed in one library, are unique or more universal than previously thought. Design/methodology/approach In this study, 903 surveys were completed across two institutions asking library patrons to identify use patterns within each library. Mean score responses were analyzed using an ANOVA, principal component analysis and RapidMiner technology. All analyses were used to identify personas with common interests and places personas in groups or neighborhoods. Findings The findings provide evidence for the universality of academic library personas. However, differences occur in how the personas are grouped and use different library services and resources. Originality/value Personas allow librarians to view patrons in a more personal way as they connect personas to specific library spaces. While the personas appear to be universal, their interactions with each other depend on specific library amenities.
两个学术图书馆人物角色的比较
目的人物角色将一群图书馆读者描述为一个人,以更好地识别和描述用户模式和需求。识别学术图书馆中的人物角色可以通过关注读者来帮助图书馆规划。最初,人物角色被认为是每个图书馆独有的;更多的见解促使研究人员重新思考这一论断。本文的目的是确定在一个库中开发的人物角色是否比以前认为的更独特或更通用。设计/方法/方法在这项研究中,在两个机构完成了903项调查,要求图书馆读者确定每个图书馆的使用模式。使用方差分析、主成分分析和RapidMiner技术对平均得分反应进行分析。所有的分析都被用来识别具有共同兴趣的人物角色,并将人物角色放在小组或社区中。研究结果为学术图书馆人物角色的普遍性提供了证据。然而,在如何对人物角色进行分组以及使用不同的库服务和资源方面会出现差异。独创性/价值人物角色允许图书馆员在将人物角色与特定图书馆空间联系起来时,以更个人化的方式看待读者。虽然人物角色看起来是通用的,但他们之间的互动取决于特定的图书馆设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信