Remapping Disability through Contested Urban Landscapes and Embodied Performances

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
G. M. Francis
{"title":"Remapping Disability through Contested Urban Landscapes and Embodied Performances","authors":"G. M. Francis","doi":"10.1017/pli.2020.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From antiquarian references to early modern corporealities, in her book Choreomania: Dance and Disorder (2018),1 theater and performance studies scholar Kélina Gotman probes the archives to expound how colonial, medical, and ethnographic discourses cultivate the materialization and dissemination of the choreomania concept. Through a process she calls “translatio,” Gotman examines popular journalistic, medical, historical, and socio-cultural repositories in order to contextualize the ways in which various spontaneous and disorderly bodily movements, occurring in public spaces, are politicized and imagined as threatening (to the social order). Using conceptual frames such as the rhizomatic (Deleuze)2 and the genealogical (Foucault),3 the author gives rise to an emergent series of critical readings on the epidemic disease. She remaps the historiography of choreomania and presents seminal embodied “choreotopology” in addition to contested “chorezones.” By centering on the importance of socially sanctioned movements as well as the fitness (control, sexuality, and","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/pli.2020.36","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2020.36","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From antiquarian references to early modern corporealities, in her book Choreomania: Dance and Disorder (2018),1 theater and performance studies scholar Kélina Gotman probes the archives to expound how colonial, medical, and ethnographic discourses cultivate the materialization and dissemination of the choreomania concept. Through a process she calls “translatio,” Gotman examines popular journalistic, medical, historical, and socio-cultural repositories in order to contextualize the ways in which various spontaneous and disorderly bodily movements, occurring in public spaces, are politicized and imagined as threatening (to the social order). Using conceptual frames such as the rhizomatic (Deleuze)2 and the genealogical (Foucault),3 the author gives rise to an emergent series of critical readings on the epidemic disease. She remaps the historiography of choreomania and presents seminal embodied “choreotopology” in addition to contested “chorezones.” By centering on the importance of socially sanctioned movements as well as the fitness (control, sexuality, and
通过有争议的城市景观和具体表演重新映射残疾
从古物参考文献到早期现代肉体,戏剧和表演研究学者k lina Gotman在她的书《舞蹈狂:舞蹈与混乱》(2018)中探索了档案,阐述了殖民、医学和民族志话语如何培养舞蹈狂概念的物化和传播。通过一个她称之为“翻译”的过程,戈特曼审视了流行的新闻、医学、历史和社会文化资料库,以便将公共空间中各种自发和无序的身体运动被政治化并被想象为威胁(对社会秩序)的方式置于语境中。利用诸如根茎(德勒兹)2和系谱(福柯)3之类的概念框架,作者提出了一系列关于流行病的批判性解读。她重新描绘了编舞癖的历史,除了有争议的“编舞区”之外,还提出了开创性的具体化“编舞拓扑”。通过关注社会认可的运动的重要性,以及健康(控制,性,和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信