When Baehr met Steffen: Appraising classicality through the lens of neglect

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Josef Ginnerskov
{"title":"When Baehr met Steffen: Appraising classicality through the lens of neglect","authors":"Josef Ginnerskov","doi":"10.1177/00016993211038818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical sociology has long served as a locus for the discipline's self-understanding, and is a phenomenon increasingly studied in its own right. The growing literature is synthesised in Peter Baehr's renowned framework for scrutinising reception and formation processes. By theorising on the trajectories of multiple classics, Baehr has helped pave the way for sociology’s understanding of how classicality becomes established. This paper deploys this framework in order to appraise neglected work with classicality potential in early sociology, namely the bulky production of Sweden's main candidate for a classic, Gustaf F. Steffen (1864–1929), with special attention given to his magnum opus Sociology: A general theory of society (1910–1911). The analysis exposes some of the conceptual ambiguity in Baehr's framework, while proposing that both the notion of a ‘classic’ and the sole focus on reception and formation need to be expanded. This article also argues that our understanding of classicality could be advanced if we were to distinguish between author, text, and theory, since each of these plays different roles in reception, formation, and neglection processes.","PeriodicalId":47591,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993211038818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Classical sociology has long served as a locus for the discipline's self-understanding, and is a phenomenon increasingly studied in its own right. The growing literature is synthesised in Peter Baehr's renowned framework for scrutinising reception and formation processes. By theorising on the trajectories of multiple classics, Baehr has helped pave the way for sociology’s understanding of how classicality becomes established. This paper deploys this framework in order to appraise neglected work with classicality potential in early sociology, namely the bulky production of Sweden's main candidate for a classic, Gustaf F. Steffen (1864–1929), with special attention given to his magnum opus Sociology: A general theory of society (1910–1911). The analysis exposes some of the conceptual ambiguity in Baehr's framework, while proposing that both the notion of a ‘classic’ and the sole focus on reception and formation need to be expanded. This article also argues that our understanding of classicality could be advanced if we were to distinguish between author, text, and theory, since each of these plays different roles in reception, formation, and neglection processes.
当Baehr遇见Steffen:通过忽视的镜头来评价古典
古典社会学长期以来一直是这门学科自我理解的场所,也是一种越来越多地被研究的现象。越来越多的文献是在彼得·贝尔著名的框架中合成的,用于审查接收和形成过程。通过将多个经典的轨迹理论化,贝尔为社会学理解经典是如何建立起来的铺平了道路。本文利用这一框架来评价早期社会学中被忽视的具有经典潜力的作品,即瑞典主要经典候选人古斯塔夫·f·斯特芬(1864-1929)的大量作品,特别关注他的代表作《社会学:社会通论》(1910-1911)。分析揭示了Baehr框架中的一些概念歧义,同时提出“经典”的概念和对接收和形成的唯一关注都需要扩展。本文还认为,如果我们能够区分作者、文本和理论,我们对古典主义的理解可能会有所提高,因为它们在接受、形成和忽视过程中都扮演着不同的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Sociologica
Acta Sociologica SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Acta Sociologica is a peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology peer reviewed journal which publishes papers on high-quality innovative sociology carried out from different theoretical and methodological starting points, in the form of full-length original articles and review essays, as well as book reviews and commentaries. Articles that present Nordic sociology or help mediate between Nordic and international scholarly discussions are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信