Regression models for count data with excess zeros: A comparison using survey data

IF 1.3
Adhin Bhaskar, K. Thennarasu, M. Philip, T. Jaisoorya
{"title":"Regression models for count data with excess zeros: A comparison using survey data","authors":"Adhin Bhaskar, K. Thennarasu, M. Philip, T. Jaisoorya","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.19.1.p001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presence of excess zeros and the distributions are major concern in modeling count data. Zero inflated and hurdle models are regression techniques which can handle zero inflated count data. This study compares various count regression models for survey data observed with excess zeros. The data for the study is obtained from a survey conducted to assess the harms attributable to drinkers among children. Poisson, negative binomial and their zero inflated and hurdle versions were compared by fitting them to two count response variables, number of physical and number of psychological harms. The models were compared using fit indices, residual analysis and predicted values. The robustness of the models were also compared using simulated data sets. Results indicated that the Poisson regression was less robust to deviations from the distributional assumptions. The negative binomial regression and hurdle regression model were found to be suitable to model the number of physical and number of psychological harms respectively. The results showed that excess zeros in count data does not imply zero inflation. The zero inflated or hurdle models are suitable for zero inflated data. The selection between the zero inflated and hurdle models should be based on the assumed cause of zeros.","PeriodicalId":93055,"journal":{"name":"The quantitative methods for psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quantitative methods for psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.19.1.p001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presence of excess zeros and the distributions are major concern in modeling count data. Zero inflated and hurdle models are regression techniques which can handle zero inflated count data. This study compares various count regression models for survey data observed with excess zeros. The data for the study is obtained from a survey conducted to assess the harms attributable to drinkers among children. Poisson, negative binomial and their zero inflated and hurdle versions were compared by fitting them to two count response variables, number of physical and number of psychological harms. The models were compared using fit indices, residual analysis and predicted values. The robustness of the models were also compared using simulated data sets. Results indicated that the Poisson regression was less robust to deviations from the distributional assumptions. The negative binomial regression and hurdle regression model were found to be suitable to model the number of physical and number of psychological harms respectively. The results showed that excess zeros in count data does not imply zero inflation. The zero inflated or hurdle models are suitable for zero inflated data. The selection between the zero inflated and hurdle models should be based on the assumed cause of zeros.
带有多余零的计数数据的回归模型:使用调查数据的比较
多余零的存在和分布是计数数据建模中主要关注的问题。零膨胀模型和障碍模型是可以处理零膨胀计数数据的回归技术。本研究比较不同的计数回归模型的调查数据观察到多余的零。这项研究的数据来自一项评估儿童饮酒者危害的调查。通过拟合生理伤害数和心理伤害数这两个计数反应变量,对泊松、负二项及其零膨胀和障碍版本进行比较。采用拟合指数、残差分析和预测值对模型进行比较。利用模拟数据集对模型的鲁棒性进行了比较。结果表明,泊松回归对偏离分布假设的稳健性较差。负二项回归模型和障碍回归模型分别适用于生理伤害数和心理伤害数的模型。结果表明,计数数据中多余的零并不意味着零通胀。零膨胀模型或障碍模型适用于零膨胀数据。在零膨胀模型和障碍模型之间的选择应该基于假设的零原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信