FEAR and "The great reset": Analysis of the World Economic Forum's post-COVID agenda videos and the adverse reactions to them

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Nemanja Milosevic, Miren Gutiérrez
{"title":"FEAR and \"The great reset\": Analysis of the World Economic Forum's post-COVID agenda videos and the adverse reactions to them","authors":"Nemanja Milosevic, Miren Gutiérrez","doi":"10.24140/ijfma.v7.n2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the ideological positions found in the visions of the future proposed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in “The Great Reset” campaign and in the internet users’ reaction to it. In this YouTube campaign, the WEF presents what it understands the “new normal” should be –understood as the new social, economic, and political relations after the COVID-19 pandemic. The YouTube users’ comments reject the agenda and express different grounds for such an attitude. This study identifies the main ideas and ideologies within the comments and in the presentation of the WEF’s campaign using the psychoanalytical political theory. The results reveal that the agenda and reactions to it are motivated by the exacerbated state of inequality and suffering caused by the current pandemic. While “The Great Reset” attempts to save capitalism by integrating human values, the comments contain populist and conspiratorial ideas. Although they rely on different epistemological grounds, the analysis reveals that both share a common understanding of a society that separates the populace against the ruling elites, who have become wealthier during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":36220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Film and Media Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Film and Media Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24140/ijfma.v7.n2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article compares the ideological positions found in the visions of the future proposed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in “The Great Reset” campaign and in the internet users’ reaction to it. In this YouTube campaign, the WEF presents what it understands the “new normal” should be –understood as the new social, economic, and political relations after the COVID-19 pandemic. The YouTube users’ comments reject the agenda and express different grounds for such an attitude. This study identifies the main ideas and ideologies within the comments and in the presentation of the WEF’s campaign using the psychoanalytical political theory. The results reveal that the agenda and reactions to it are motivated by the exacerbated state of inequality and suffering caused by the current pandemic. While “The Great Reset” attempts to save capitalism by integrating human values, the comments contain populist and conspiratorial ideas. Although they rely on different epistemological grounds, the analysis reveals that both share a common understanding of a society that separates the populace against the ruling elites, who have become wealthier during the pandemic.
恐惧与“大重置”:分析世界经济论坛后疫情议程视频及其负面反应
本文比较了世界经济论坛(WEF)在“大重置”运动中提出的未来愿景中的意识形态立场,以及互联网用户对此的反应。在这个YouTube宣传活动中,世界经济论坛展示了它所理解的“新常态”应该是什么——被理解为新冠肺炎大流行后新的社会、经济和政治关系。YouTube用户的评论拒绝了议程,表达了对这种态度的不同理由。本研究利用精神分析政治理论,在评论和世界经济论坛运动的介绍中确定了主要思想和意识形态。结果表明,议程和对议程的反应的动机是当前大流行病造成的不平等加剧和痛苦。虽然“大重置”试图通过整合人类价值观来拯救资本主义,但评论中包含了民粹主义和阴谋论思想。尽管他们基于不同的认识论基础,但分析显示,他们对一个将民众与统治精英分开的社会有着共同的理解,统治精英在大流行期间变得更加富有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Film and Media Arts
International Journal of Film and Media Arts Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信