Building “common knowledge” when responding to major road tunnel incidents: an inter-organisational focus group study

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ann Eklund, S. Karlsson, Lina Gyllencreutz
{"title":"Building “common knowledge” when responding to major road tunnel incidents: an inter-organisational focus group study","authors":"Ann Eklund, S. Karlsson, Lina Gyllencreutz","doi":"10.1108/ijes-02-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeMajor incidents in tunnel environment will pose several challenges for the emergency service organisations in terms of heat, visibility and lack of experiences from working in confined environments. These aspects, in turn, could pose challenges to establish collaboration. This study aims to contribute to the field of collaborative tunnel responses by exploring how “common knowledge” (Edwards, 2011) is built by the emergency services organisations, that is, what the organisations consider important while working on a potentially common problem, and their motives for the interpretations and actions if a major tunnel incident occurs.Design/methodology/approachParticipants from the road traffic control centre, emergency dispatch centre, emergency medical service, rescue service and police were included in the study. Data from four focus group sessions was analysed using thematic analysis.FindingsThe study revealed that the tunnel environment presents specific aspects of how common knowledge was produced related to lifesaving and safety. The themes structuring mechanisms to reduce uncertainty, managing information for initial priorities, aligning responsibilities without hampering each other's work and adjusting actions to manage distance, illustrated how common knowledge was produced as crucial aspects to a collaborative response. Organising management sites, grasping and communicating risks, accessing the injury victims, was challenged by the confined environment, physical distances and imbalance in access to information and preparedness activities in tunnel environments.Originality/valueThis study offers new insights of common knowledge, by illustrating a motive perspective on collaborative responses in tunnel incidents. Creating interoperability calls not just for readiness for action and tunnel safety, but also training activities acknowledging different interpretations and motives to further develop tunnel responses.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-02-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeMajor incidents in tunnel environment will pose several challenges for the emergency service organisations in terms of heat, visibility and lack of experiences from working in confined environments. These aspects, in turn, could pose challenges to establish collaboration. This study aims to contribute to the field of collaborative tunnel responses by exploring how “common knowledge” (Edwards, 2011) is built by the emergency services organisations, that is, what the organisations consider important while working on a potentially common problem, and their motives for the interpretations and actions if a major tunnel incident occurs.Design/methodology/approachParticipants from the road traffic control centre, emergency dispatch centre, emergency medical service, rescue service and police were included in the study. Data from four focus group sessions was analysed using thematic analysis.FindingsThe study revealed that the tunnel environment presents specific aspects of how common knowledge was produced related to lifesaving and safety. The themes structuring mechanisms to reduce uncertainty, managing information for initial priorities, aligning responsibilities without hampering each other's work and adjusting actions to manage distance, illustrated how common knowledge was produced as crucial aspects to a collaborative response. Organising management sites, grasping and communicating risks, accessing the injury victims, was challenged by the confined environment, physical distances and imbalance in access to information and preparedness activities in tunnel environments.Originality/valueThis study offers new insights of common knowledge, by illustrating a motive perspective on collaborative responses in tunnel incidents. Creating interoperability calls not just for readiness for action and tunnel safety, but also training activities acknowledging different interpretations and motives to further develop tunnel responses.
在应对重大道路隧道事故时建立“常识”:跨机构焦点小组研究
目的隧道环境中的重大事故将给应急服务组织带来一些挑战,包括高温、能见度和缺乏在密闭环境中工作的经验。反过来,这些方面可能对建立合作构成挑战。本研究旨在通过探索应急服务组织如何建立“共同知识”(Edwards,2011),即组织在处理潜在的共同问题时认为什么是重要的,以及如果发生重大隧道事故,他们做出解释和采取行动的动机,为隧道合作应对领域做出贡献。设计/方法/方法来自道路交通控制中心、紧急调度中心、紧急医疗服务、救援服务和警察的参与者被纳入研究。采用专题分析法对四次重点小组会议的数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,隧道环境呈现了与救生和安全相关的常识产生的具体方面。主题构建机制以减少不确定性、管理初始优先事项的信息、在不妨碍彼此工作的情况下协调责任以及调整行动以管理距离,说明了共同知识是如何作为协作应对的关键方面产生的。受限的环境、物理距离以及隧道环境中获取信息和准备活动的不平衡,对组织管理现场、把握和沟通风险、接触受伤受害者提出了挑战。独创性/价值这项研究通过阐明隧道事故中合作反应的动机视角,提供了对常识的新见解。创建互操作性不仅需要为行动和隧道安全做好准备,还需要培训活动,承认不同的解释和动机,以进一步发展隧道应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信