Two Approaches to Reexamining the Writings of Wang Anshi (1021–1086)

IF 0.5 4区社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.7817/jaos.143.2.2023.ra002

Michael Fuller

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partisan historiographic intervention has strongly shaped what we know of the life and writings of the controversial Northern Song dynasty official Wang Anshi. Thus, interpreting his surviving textual legacy presents a significant challenge. The two monographs under review offer very different approaches to this challenge. Yang Xiaoshan explores the history of the interpretive issues, while Jonathan Pease takes a very personal approach to a lifetime of reflection on Wang Anshi’s life and works.

查看原文本刊更多论文

重新审视王安石(1021-1086)作品的两种途径

党派的历史介入有力地塑造了我们所知道的北宋官员王安石的生活和著作。因此，解读他现存的文本遗产是一个重大挑战。正在审查的两本专著对这一挑战提出了截然不同的方法。杨小山探索了释意问题的历史，而乔纳森·皮斯则以一种非常个人化的方式对王安石的一生和作品进行了反思。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY ASIAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

33.30%

发文量

101

期刊介绍： The American Oriental Society is the oldest learned society in the United States devoted to a particular field of scholarship. The Society was founded in 1842, preceded only by such distinguished organizations of general scope as the American Philosophical Society (1743), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1780), and the American Antiquarian Society (1812). From the beginning its aims have been humanistic. The encouragement of basic research in the languages and literatures of Asia has always been central in its tradition. This tradition has come to include such subjects as philology, literary criticism, textual criticism, paleography, epigraphy, linguistics, biography, archaeology, and the history of the intellectual and imaginative aspects of Oriental civilizations.