{"title":"The ups and downs of relative particles in German diachrony","authors":"Ann M. Moser","doi":"10.1075/jhl.22026.mos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The aim and scope of this article is to take a closer look at the functions and semantics of the three relative\n particles da, so, and wo, and to show that they have developed differently over a period from\n 1350 to 1800, continuing up to our modern dialects and the standard language. We will focus on wo because it is\n the only relativizer which is attested both as locative relative and as general relative clause marker, and we will propose that\n wo has extended its functional domain from a locative relative to a general relative marker. We will\n furthermore discuss if there has been a grammaticalization path “relative locative > general relative clause marker” in German\n diachrony or not. Finally, we will suggest that standardization processes are responsible for the different degrees of functional\n extension of wo attested in the historical/modern varieties and the standard language.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22026.mos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim and scope of this article is to take a closer look at the functions and semantics of the three relative
particles da, so, and wo, and to show that they have developed differently over a period from
1350 to 1800, continuing up to our modern dialects and the standard language. We will focus on wo because it is
the only relativizer which is attested both as locative relative and as general relative clause marker, and we will propose that
wo has extended its functional domain from a locative relative to a general relative marker. We will
furthermore discuss if there has been a grammaticalization path “relative locative > general relative clause marker” in German
diachrony or not. Finally, we will suggest that standardization processes are responsible for the different degrees of functional
extension of wo attested in the historical/modern varieties and the standard language.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.