Compliance rate of anti-rabies vaccination in patients presenting with an animal bite

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rathijit Pal, Vaishnavi Vegiraju, D. Hazra, A. Nekkanti, K. Abhilash
{"title":"Compliance rate of anti-rabies vaccination in patients presenting with an animal bite","authors":"Rathijit Pal, Vaishnavi Vegiraju, D. Hazra, A. Nekkanti, K. Abhilash","doi":"10.4103/ijam.ijam_54_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To prevent rabies in animal bite victims, complete postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) with an anti-rabies vaccination (ARV) is essential. This study was done to determine the compliance rate of ARV in patients with animal bites who presented to the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study done on patients presenting to the ED with a history of animal bites over 1 year (May 2020–June 2021). Categorical variables were presented as percentages, and quantitative variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: A total of 122 animal bite (World Health Organization [WHO] Category II and III) victims presented to the ED during the study. The mean age of the cohort was 38.12 (SD: 16.4) years with a male (n = 67: 54.9%) preponderance. Based on the physiological stability, a majority were triaged as priority III (n = 119; 97.5%). Most patients presented with dog bites (n = 88; 72.1%), followed by cat (n = 14; 11.5%) and rat bites (n = 13; 10.7%). Two-thirds were unprovoked (n = 82; 67.2%) and were caused by stray animals (n = 62; 50.8%). More than half (n = 65; 53.3%) of the bites were WHO Category III bites. All Category II and III patients had received the first dose of ARV at our center and category III patients received immunoglobulin local injection as well. Noncompliance to ARV was seen in almost a quarter (n = 32; 26.2%) of patients of which forgotten dates (n = 11; 34.4%) were the most common cause. There was no significant statistical variable to determine the cause of noncompliance. Conclusion: Unprovoked bites by stray dogs were the cause of a majority of the animal bites. Compliance with PEP remains low at two-thirds of the total. The most common cause of noncompliance to ARV was due to forgotten dates. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge, Systems-based practice, Practice-based learning and improvement.","PeriodicalId":36495,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"199 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_54_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To prevent rabies in animal bite victims, complete postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) with an anti-rabies vaccination (ARV) is essential. This study was done to determine the compliance rate of ARV in patients with animal bites who presented to the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study done on patients presenting to the ED with a history of animal bites over 1 year (May 2020–June 2021). Categorical variables were presented as percentages, and quantitative variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: A total of 122 animal bite (World Health Organization [WHO] Category II and III) victims presented to the ED during the study. The mean age of the cohort was 38.12 (SD: 16.4) years with a male (n = 67: 54.9%) preponderance. Based on the physiological stability, a majority were triaged as priority III (n = 119; 97.5%). Most patients presented with dog bites (n = 88; 72.1%), followed by cat (n = 14; 11.5%) and rat bites (n = 13; 10.7%). Two-thirds were unprovoked (n = 82; 67.2%) and were caused by stray animals (n = 62; 50.8%). More than half (n = 65; 53.3%) of the bites were WHO Category III bites. All Category II and III patients had received the first dose of ARV at our center and category III patients received immunoglobulin local injection as well. Noncompliance to ARV was seen in almost a quarter (n = 32; 26.2%) of patients of which forgotten dates (n = 11; 34.4%) were the most common cause. There was no significant statistical variable to determine the cause of noncompliance. Conclusion: Unprovoked bites by stray dogs were the cause of a majority of the animal bites. Compliance with PEP remains low at two-thirds of the total. The most common cause of noncompliance to ARV was due to forgotten dates. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge, Systems-based practice, Practice-based learning and improvement.
动物咬伤患者抗狂犬病疫苗接种依从率
引言:为了预防动物咬伤患者的狂犬病,必须进行完整的暴露后预防(PEP)和抗狂犬病疫苗接种(ARV)。本研究旨在确定新冠肺炎大流行期间急诊科(ED)动物咬伤患者的ARV依从率。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,针对有1年以上动物咬伤史的急诊患者(2020年5月至2021年6月)。分类变量以百分比表示,定量变量使用平均值和标准差(SD)进行总结。结果:在研究期间,共有122名动物咬伤(世界卫生组织世界卫生组织]第二类和第三类)受害者向ED报告。该队列的平均年龄为38.12岁(标准差:16.4),男性(n=67:54.9%)占优势。根据生理稳定性,大多数患者被分为III级(n=119;97.5%)。大多数患者被狗咬伤(n=88;72.1%),其次是猫咬伤(n=14;11.5%)和老鼠咬伤(n=13;10.7%)。三分之二是无端咬伤(n=82;67.2%),由流浪动物引起(n=62;50.8%)。超过一半(n=65;53.3%)的咬伤是世界卫生组织III级咬伤。所有II类和III类患者都在我们的中心接受了第一剂抗逆转录病毒药物,III类患者也接受了免疫球蛋白局部注射。近四分之一(n=32;26.2%)的患者不遵守抗逆转录病毒药物,其中忘记日期(n=11;34.4%)是最常见的原因。没有显著的统计变量来确定不合规的原因。结论:流浪狗未经孵化的咬伤是造成大多数动物咬伤的原因。对政治公众人物的遵守率仍然很低,仅占总数的三分之二。不遵守ARV的最常见原因是忘记日期。本文讨论了以下核心能力:医学知识、基于系统的实践、基于实践的学习和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Academic Medicine
International Journal of Academic Medicine Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信