Regulating Cannabis: A Comparative Exploration of Canadian Legalization

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q3 BUSINESS

American Business Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1111/ablj.12175

Peter Bowal, Kathryn Kisska-Schulze, Richard Haigh, Adrienne Ng

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores cannabis regulation in Canada and the United States and examines how recent legalization efforts have manifested differently in each country. Although some of these differences are explained by uncompromising constitutional structures, this comparative exercise examines each system's political choices. While emphasis is placed on the Canadian experience, this article seeks to inform and enhance policy and regulation in both countries in addition to highlighting inherent ethical issues.

查看原文本刊更多论文

管制大麻：加拿大合法化的比较探索

本文探讨了加拿大和美国的大麻管制，并探讨了最近的合法化努力在每个国家的表现不同。虽然其中一些差异可以用不妥协的宪法结构来解释，但这种比较研究考察了每个制度的政治选择。虽然重点放在加拿大的经验上，但本文除了强调固有的道德问题外，还试图为两国的政策和法规提供信息和加强。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Business Law Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The ABLJ is a faculty-edited, double blind peer reviewed journal, continuously published since 1963. Our mission is to publish only top quality law review articles that make a scholarly contribution to all areas of law that impact business theory and practice. We search for those articles that articulate a novel research question and make a meaningful contribution directly relevant to scholars and practitioners of business law. The blind peer review process means legal scholars well-versed in the relevant specialty area have determined selected articles are original, thorough, important, and timely. Faculty editors assure the authors’ contribution to scholarship is evident. We aim to elevate legal scholarship and inform responsible business decisions.