{"title":"Household Structure and Sources of Income in a Rice-Growing Village in Northeast Thailand","authors":"Yuko Shirai, A. Rambo","doi":"10.20495/SEAS.6.2_275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAs part of the ongoing agrarian transformation in Northeast Thailand (commonly called \"Isan\"), major changes of rural households have been occurring. For instance, the average size of households has decreased, and nuclear households, formerly the predominant type, have declined in number, and new household types have been emerging. Associated with changes in household structure are changes in sources of income, which are becoming increasingly diversified, with a decline in the contribution made by agriculture and a growing share of income coming from non-agricultural sources. So marked is this shift that contemporary Isan agricultural households have been called \"part-time farmers\" (Takeuchi 2004; Rigg 2005; Grandstaff et al. 2008).Although many of these broad changes in rural households and their sources of income have been discussed by other researchers at a rather general level (Smith 1978; Grandstaff et al. 2008; Rigg and Salamanca 2009; 2011; Keyes 2010; Rigg et al. 2012; Chawanote and Barrett 2013), no detailed descriptions of the nature of changes occurring at the village level have been published. Moreover, many members of the general public, as well as academics, journalists, and policy makers, continue to cling to the old stereotype of rural Isan villagers as poor rainfed rice farmers and have not yet perceived the extent to which rural society and economy in the region have changed. Understanding the reality of rural people's livelihoods in Isan is essential in order to formulate more realistic development policies that will truly serve the interests of local people in the region. Therefore, we undertook this study in a village in Khon Kaen Province in Northeast Thailand in order to describe the current structure of rural households and identify their sources of income. In this paper, we seek to: (1) describe the composition of rural households and classify them into structural types; (2) examine changes that have occurred in the size and types of households over the past 50 years; (3) examine the relationship of household structures and age distribution, types of livelihoods, and agricultural activities; (4) identify the income sources of different types of households; and (5) examine the relationship of household structures with levels of income and debt.Overview of Nong Ben VillageThis research was carried out in Nong Ben village (16°37T2\"N, 102°49'59\"E) in Khon Kaen Province. The village is located approximately 20 kilometers northeast of Khon Kaen Municipality along National Highway No. 2 (Fig. 1). Nong Ben village is one of 10 villages in Non Thon Subdistrict (tambol). Nong Ben was a single village (Muban) until 2006, when it was divided into two administrative villages, each with its own headman.The village area of Nong Ben is about 6,291 rai (1,007 ha) (Sunantha 2002). The total agricultural area was about 5,039 rai (806 ha) in 2005 but had declined to around 4,111 rai (658 ha) in 2011. Water for irrigation is supplied by a canal from the Ubolratana dam in Nam Phong District, which is around 30 kilometers from the village. After irrigation first came to the village in 1968, the household economy of the villagers changed dramatically because it became possible to plant a second rice crop in the dry season and to cultivate other valuable crops such as flowers and vegetables.There are three different agricultural land-use in the village: (1) rainfed upland cash crop fields (cassava, sugarcane, and rubber); (2) irrigated fields used to grow rice and other crops (e.g., flowers and vegetables); and (3) rainfed paddy fields. The total area of paddy fields in 2002 was about 3,019 rai (483 ha), which had declined to 2,501 rai (400 ha) in 2011. In 2006, about 53% of village households had only irrigated paddy fields, 11% had only rainfed paddy fields, and 36% had both types of paddy fields (Shirai et al. 2007). The villagers plant glutinous rice (RD6 variety), mostly for self-consumption, and jasmine rice (KDML105 variety) for sale. …","PeriodicalId":42525,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"275-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.20495/SEAS.6.2_275","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20495/SEAS.6.2_275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
IntroductionAs part of the ongoing agrarian transformation in Northeast Thailand (commonly called "Isan"), major changes of rural households have been occurring. For instance, the average size of households has decreased, and nuclear households, formerly the predominant type, have declined in number, and new household types have been emerging. Associated with changes in household structure are changes in sources of income, which are becoming increasingly diversified, with a decline in the contribution made by agriculture and a growing share of income coming from non-agricultural sources. So marked is this shift that contemporary Isan agricultural households have been called "part-time farmers" (Takeuchi 2004; Rigg 2005; Grandstaff et al. 2008).Although many of these broad changes in rural households and their sources of income have been discussed by other researchers at a rather general level (Smith 1978; Grandstaff et al. 2008; Rigg and Salamanca 2009; 2011; Keyes 2010; Rigg et al. 2012; Chawanote and Barrett 2013), no detailed descriptions of the nature of changes occurring at the village level have been published. Moreover, many members of the general public, as well as academics, journalists, and policy makers, continue to cling to the old stereotype of rural Isan villagers as poor rainfed rice farmers and have not yet perceived the extent to which rural society and economy in the region have changed. Understanding the reality of rural people's livelihoods in Isan is essential in order to formulate more realistic development policies that will truly serve the interests of local people in the region. Therefore, we undertook this study in a village in Khon Kaen Province in Northeast Thailand in order to describe the current structure of rural households and identify their sources of income. In this paper, we seek to: (1) describe the composition of rural households and classify them into structural types; (2) examine changes that have occurred in the size and types of households over the past 50 years; (3) examine the relationship of household structures and age distribution, types of livelihoods, and agricultural activities; (4) identify the income sources of different types of households; and (5) examine the relationship of household structures with levels of income and debt.Overview of Nong Ben VillageThis research was carried out in Nong Ben village (16°37T2"N, 102°49'59"E) in Khon Kaen Province. The village is located approximately 20 kilometers northeast of Khon Kaen Municipality along National Highway No. 2 (Fig. 1). Nong Ben village is one of 10 villages in Non Thon Subdistrict (tambol). Nong Ben was a single village (Muban) until 2006, when it was divided into two administrative villages, each with its own headman.The village area of Nong Ben is about 6,291 rai (1,007 ha) (Sunantha 2002). The total agricultural area was about 5,039 rai (806 ha) in 2005 but had declined to around 4,111 rai (658 ha) in 2011. Water for irrigation is supplied by a canal from the Ubolratana dam in Nam Phong District, which is around 30 kilometers from the village. After irrigation first came to the village in 1968, the household economy of the villagers changed dramatically because it became possible to plant a second rice crop in the dry season and to cultivate other valuable crops such as flowers and vegetables.There are three different agricultural land-use in the village: (1) rainfed upland cash crop fields (cassava, sugarcane, and rubber); (2) irrigated fields used to grow rice and other crops (e.g., flowers and vegetables); and (3) rainfed paddy fields. The total area of paddy fields in 2002 was about 3,019 rai (483 ha), which had declined to 2,501 rai (400 ha) in 2011. In 2006, about 53% of village households had only irrigated paddy fields, 11% had only rainfed paddy fields, and 36% had both types of paddy fields (Shirai et al. 2007). The villagers plant glutinous rice (RD6 variety), mostly for self-consumption, and jasmine rice (KDML105 variety) for sale. …
作为泰国东北部(通常称为“Isan”)正在进行的农业转型的一部分,农村家庭正在发生重大变化。例如,家庭的平均规模减少了,以前占主导地位的核心家庭数量减少了,新的家庭类型正在出现。与家庭结构的变化有关的是收入来源的变化,收入来源日益多样化,农业的贡献减少,非农业来源的收入所占的份额越来越大。这种转变是如此显著,以至于当代Isan农业家庭被称为“兼职农民”(Takeuchi 2004;Rigg 2005;Grandstaff et al. 2008)。尽管其他研究人员在相当一般的层面上讨论了农村家庭及其收入来源的许多这些广泛变化(Smith 1978;Grandstaff et al. 2008;Rigg and Salamanca 2009;2011;凯斯2010;Rigg et al. 2012;Chawanote和Barrett(2013)),没有详细描述村庄层面发生的变化的性质。此外,许多普通民众,包括学者、记者和政策制定者,仍然坚持认为伊桑农村村民是贫穷的雨养稻农,没有意识到该地区农村社会和经济的变化程度。了解伊桑农村人民的生计状况对于制定更切合实际的发展政策至关重要,这些政策将真正为该地区当地人民的利益服务。因此,我们在泰国东北部孔敬省的一个村庄进行了这项研究,以描述当前的农村家庭结构并确定他们的收入来源。本文试图:(1)描述农村家庭的构成,并将其划分为结构类型;(2)考察近50年来家庭规模和类型的变化;(3)研究家庭结构与年龄分布、生计类型和农业活动之间的关系;(4)确定不同类型家庭的收入来源;(5)考察家庭结构与收入和债务水平的关系。这项研究在孔钦省的农本村(16°37T2"N, 102°49'59"E)进行。农本村位于孔敬市东北约20公里处,沿国道2号(图1)。农本村是孔敬街道(tambol) 10个村庄之一。2006年以前,农本是一个单独的村,后来被分成两个行政村,每个行政村都有自己的村长。农本村的面积约为6,291拉伊(1,007公顷)(Sunantha 2002)。2005年,农业总面积约为5039拉伊(806公顷),但2011年已降至4111拉伊(658公顷)左右。灌溉用水由南丰区乌波拉塔纳大坝的一条运河提供,该水坝距离村庄约30公里。自1968年灌溉技术首次进入该村以来,村民的家庭经济发生了巨大变化,因为有可能在旱季种植第二种水稻作物,并种植其他有价值的作物,如花卉和蔬菜。该村有三种不同的农业利用方式:(1)旱地经济作物田(木薯、甘蔗和橡胶);(2)用于种植水稻和其他作物(如花卉和蔬菜)的灌溉田;(3)雨养水田。2002年稻田总面积约为3019拉伊(483公顷),2011年减少到2501拉伊(400公顷)。2006年,约53%的村庄家庭只有灌溉水田,11%的村庄家庭只有雨养水田,36%的村庄家庭两种水田都有(Shirai et al. 2007)。村民们种植的糯米(RD6品种)主要用于自用,茉莉大米(KDML105品种)用于销售。...
期刊介绍:
The new journal aims to promote excellent, agenda-setting scholarship and provide a forum for dialogue and collaboration both within and beyond the region. Southeast Asian Studies engages in wide-ranging and in-depth discussions that are attuned to the issues, debates, and imperatives within the region, while affirming the importance of learning and sharing ideas on a cross-country, global, and historical scale. An integral part of the journal’s mandate is to foster scholarship that is capable of bridging the continuing divide in area studies between the social sciences and humanities, on the one hand, and the natural sciences, on the other hand. To this end, the journal welcomes accessibly written articles that build on insights and cutting-edge research from the natural sciences. The journal also publishes research reports, which are shorter but fully peer-reviewed articles that present original findings or new concepts that result from specific research projects or outcomes of research collaboration.