Case Study: Does Following Best Practices Increase LibGuides Usage?

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
D. Brush
{"title":"Case Study: Does Following Best Practices Increase LibGuides Usage?","authors":"D. Brush","doi":"10.1080/19322909.2022.2112798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This case study describes the work of a library task force led by the author to implement best practices for the design of web-based library guides using the LibGuides platform. The task force’s goal was to increase usage of guides. The task force learned that students were primarily finding library guides through searching on the open web, which has significant implications for guide design. It was hoped that incorporating usability research and search engine optimization (SEO) techniques into guide design would drive more traffic to the guides. Statistics available from the LibGuides platform were compared between the 2020 and 2021 academic year and the 2021–2022 academic year but no improvement in guide usage was found. In fact, usage for most guides was lower in 2021–2022.","PeriodicalId":54091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2022.2112798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This case study describes the work of a library task force led by the author to implement best practices for the design of web-based library guides using the LibGuides platform. The task force’s goal was to increase usage of guides. The task force learned that students were primarily finding library guides through searching on the open web, which has significant implications for guide design. It was hoped that incorporating usability research and search engine optimization (SEO) techniques into guide design would drive more traffic to the guides. Statistics available from the LibGuides platform were compared between the 2020 and 2021 academic year and the 2021–2022 academic year but no improvement in guide usage was found. In fact, usage for most guides was lower in 2021–2022.
案例研究:下列最佳实践是否会增加LibGuides的使用?
本案例研究描述了由作者领导的图书馆工作小组使用LibGuides平台实现基于web的图书馆指南设计的最佳实践。工作组的目标是增加指南的使用。工作组了解到,学生主要是通过在开放网络上搜索来查找图书馆指南,这对指南设计具有重要意义。希望将可用性研究和搜索引擎优化(SEO)技术结合到指南设计中,可以为指南带来更多的流量。LibGuides平台上的统计数据比较了2020 - 2021学年和2021 - 2022学年,但没有发现指南使用的改善。事实上,在2021-2022年,大多数指南的使用率都较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Web Librarianship
Journal of Web Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信