The effect of repetitive topical applications of local anesthetics (EMLA) on experimental pain and itch (histaminergic and nonhistaminergic)

Giulia Erica Aliotta, S. L. Vecchio, J. Elberling, L. Arendt-Nielsen
{"title":"The effect of repetitive topical applications of local anesthetics (EMLA) on experimental pain and itch (histaminergic and nonhistaminergic)","authors":"Giulia Erica Aliotta, S. L. Vecchio, J. Elberling, L. Arendt-Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/itx.0000000000000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effects of repeated topical applications of local anesthetics are poorly investigated as they may, in addition to analgesia, impact peripheral nerve endings in a cumulative manner. In the present study, the effects of 6 repetitive applications of eutectic mixture of lidocaine (EMLA 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) were investigated on experimentally induced pain, histaminergic and nonhistaminergic itch, and neurogenic inflammation. Methods: Four skin areas on the forearms of 24 subjects were randomized to receive 3 hours of application of EMLA or placebo twice a day for 3 consecutive days. After each application, superficial blood perfusion (SBP), mechanical (mechanically evoked itch, mechanical pain threshold, and mechanical pain sensitivity), and thermal sensitivity (warm detection threshold, heat pain threshold, and suprathreshold heat sensitivity) were assessed. After the last application of EMLA/placebo, histamine and cowhage was applied (2 areas each) and itch and pain intensity and SBP were assessed. Results: After 3 hours of EMLA application, significant mechanical and thermal hypoalgesia were found with no cumulative efficacy over the 3 days. EMLA alone had no effect on SBP. Significantly increased SBP, reduced cowhage-induced itch, but the unaffected histamine-induced itch was found when applying EMLA ahead of histamine and cowhage. Conclusions: EMLA induced a reduction of mechanical and thermal sensitivity without a cumulative-dose effect. EMLA reduced nonhistaminergic itch and pain but not the experimentally provoked histaminergic itch. Selective action of EMLA on polymodal C-fibers could explain these effects.","PeriodicalId":73523,"journal":{"name":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"8 1","pages":"e70 - e70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effects of repeated topical applications of local anesthetics are poorly investigated as they may, in addition to analgesia, impact peripheral nerve endings in a cumulative manner. In the present study, the effects of 6 repetitive applications of eutectic mixture of lidocaine (EMLA 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) were investigated on experimentally induced pain, histaminergic and nonhistaminergic itch, and neurogenic inflammation. Methods: Four skin areas on the forearms of 24 subjects were randomized to receive 3 hours of application of EMLA or placebo twice a day for 3 consecutive days. After each application, superficial blood perfusion (SBP), mechanical (mechanically evoked itch, mechanical pain threshold, and mechanical pain sensitivity), and thermal sensitivity (warm detection threshold, heat pain threshold, and suprathreshold heat sensitivity) were assessed. After the last application of EMLA/placebo, histamine and cowhage was applied (2 areas each) and itch and pain intensity and SBP were assessed. Results: After 3 hours of EMLA application, significant mechanical and thermal hypoalgesia were found with no cumulative efficacy over the 3 days. EMLA alone had no effect on SBP. Significantly increased SBP, reduced cowhage-induced itch, but the unaffected histamine-induced itch was found when applying EMLA ahead of histamine and cowhage. Conclusions: EMLA induced a reduction of mechanical and thermal sensitivity without a cumulative-dose effect. EMLA reduced nonhistaminergic itch and pain but not the experimentally provoked histaminergic itch. Selective action of EMLA on polymodal C-fibers could explain these effects.
反复局部应用局部麻醉剂(EMLA)对实验性疼痛和瘙痒(组胺能和非组胺能)的影响
背景:局部麻醉剂的反复局部应用的效果研究很少,因为除了镇痛作用外,它们还可能以累积的方式影响周围神经末梢。在本研究中,我们研究了利多卡因共混物(EMLA 2.5%和prilocaine 2.5%) 6次重复应用对实验性疼痛、组胺性和非组胺性瘙痒以及神经源性炎症的影响。方法:24例受试者前臂4个皮肤区域随机接受3小时EMLA或安慰剂应用,每天2次,连续3天。每次应用后,评估浅表血流灌注(SBP)、机械(机械诱发瘙痒、机械痛阈和机械痛敏感性)和热敏性(热检测阈、热痛阈和超阈热敏性)。最后一次应用EMLA/安慰剂后,应用组胺和奶牛(各2个区域),评估瘙痒、疼痛强度和收缩压。结果:EMLA应用3小时后,发现明显的机械和热痛觉减退,3天内无累积效果。单独使用EMLA对收缩压无影响。在组胺和奶牛之前使用EMLA可显著增加收缩压,减少奶牛诱导的瘙痒,但组胺诱导的瘙痒未受影响。结论:EMLA诱导机械和热敏性降低,无累积剂量效应。EMLA减少了非组胺性瘙痒和疼痛,但没有实验引起的组胺性瘙痒。EMLA对多模c -纤维的选择性作用可以解释这些效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信