US healthcare facility management workforce trends: a comparison with demographics, compensation and tenure of facility management professionals in nonhealthcare industries

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Facilities Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1108/f-08-2022-0115
S. Call
{"title":"US healthcare facility management workforce trends: a comparison with demographics, compensation and tenure of facility management professionals in nonhealthcare industries","authors":"S. Call","doi":"10.1108/f-08-2022-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study was to better understand the state of the healthcare facility management (FM) workforce and trends and how it compares to the nonhealthcare industries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey was developed, based on relevant literature, regarding respondents’ gender, race, age, educational attainment and job tenure. The survey was sent electronically via Qualtrics® system in February 2021 to members of the International Facility Management Association membership; 3,557 individuals completed the survey by April 2021, for a 29% response rate. Only data from 1,407 US respondents working in facility operations were included in this study. Of the 1,407 respondents included in this study, 89 worked in the healthcare industry. The majority of respondents not working in healthcare industry (1,318) were employed in government, education or banking and investment.\n\n\nFindings\nThe demographics of facility managers in the healthcare industry are similar to the demographics of facility managers in other industries: the majority of the FM workforce is male, middle-aged, white, college educated and employed in-house. While healthcare and nonhealthcare facility managers have similar responsibilities across job levels, compensation for entry-level FM roles in the healthcare industry is significantly lower than for entry-level FM roles in other industries. This low pay in healthcare FM, compared to other industries, may exacerbate ongoing challenges related to talent recruitment and retention and justify pay banding increases to improve attraction of top talent into healthcare FM. Both healthcare and nonhealthcare industries hire new college graduates for entry-level FM jobs, but the healthcare industry is more likely to hire individuals who majored in liberal arts compared to other industries more likely to hire individuals who majored in subjects related to the built environment such as FM and engineering. To compensate for low entry-level pay, healthcare organizations may be focusing recruitment efforts on liberal arts students who have little to no training in the built environment because they have lower pay expectations. Older healthcare facility professionals also have shorter job tenures with their current employers than do older facility professionals in other industries; this trend appears to be recent and not be related to pay or the COVID-19 pandemic. A surge of senior-level FM retirements may be creating advancement opportunities for older entry- and mid-level FM personnel in healthcare; if this situation is a factor, research should be conducted to understand its implications for recruiting and developing healthcare FM talent.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nOnly data from US respondents who were working in healthcare facility operations at the time of the study were included in the data analysis.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nHealthcare organizations can use the study’s findings to help address FM workforce challenges unique to their industry staff recruitment, retention and succession planning.\n","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-08-2022-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand the state of the healthcare facility management (FM) workforce and trends and how it compares to the nonhealthcare industries. Design/methodology/approach A survey was developed, based on relevant literature, regarding respondents’ gender, race, age, educational attainment and job tenure. The survey was sent electronically via Qualtrics® system in February 2021 to members of the International Facility Management Association membership; 3,557 individuals completed the survey by April 2021, for a 29% response rate. Only data from 1,407 US respondents working in facility operations were included in this study. Of the 1,407 respondents included in this study, 89 worked in the healthcare industry. The majority of respondents not working in healthcare industry (1,318) were employed in government, education or banking and investment. Findings The demographics of facility managers in the healthcare industry are similar to the demographics of facility managers in other industries: the majority of the FM workforce is male, middle-aged, white, college educated and employed in-house. While healthcare and nonhealthcare facility managers have similar responsibilities across job levels, compensation for entry-level FM roles in the healthcare industry is significantly lower than for entry-level FM roles in other industries. This low pay in healthcare FM, compared to other industries, may exacerbate ongoing challenges related to talent recruitment and retention and justify pay banding increases to improve attraction of top talent into healthcare FM. Both healthcare and nonhealthcare industries hire new college graduates for entry-level FM jobs, but the healthcare industry is more likely to hire individuals who majored in liberal arts compared to other industries more likely to hire individuals who majored in subjects related to the built environment such as FM and engineering. To compensate for low entry-level pay, healthcare organizations may be focusing recruitment efforts on liberal arts students who have little to no training in the built environment because they have lower pay expectations. Older healthcare facility professionals also have shorter job tenures with their current employers than do older facility professionals in other industries; this trend appears to be recent and not be related to pay or the COVID-19 pandemic. A surge of senior-level FM retirements may be creating advancement opportunities for older entry- and mid-level FM personnel in healthcare; if this situation is a factor, research should be conducted to understand its implications for recruiting and developing healthcare FM talent. Research limitations/implications Only data from US respondents who were working in healthcare facility operations at the time of the study were included in the data analysis. Originality/value Healthcare organizations can use the study’s findings to help address FM workforce challenges unique to their industry staff recruitment, retention and succession planning.
美国医疗机构管理人员的趋势:与非医疗行业机构管理专业人员的人口统计、薪酬和任期的比较
目的本研究的目的是更好地了解医疗设施管理(FM)劳动力的状态和趋势,以及它与非医疗保健行业的比较。设计/方法/方法根据相关文献,对被访者的性别、种族、年龄、受教育程度和工作任期进行了调查。该调查于2021年2月通过Qualtrics®系统以电子方式发送给国际设施管理协会会员;截至2021年4月,共有3557人完成了调查,回复率为29%。本研究仅包括来自1,407名从事设施运营的美国受访者的数据。在这项研究的1,407名受访者中,有89人在医疗保健行业工作。大多数不在医疗保健行业工作的受访者(1318人)受雇于政府、教育或银行和投资部门。医疗保健行业的设施管理人员的人口统计数据与其他行业的设施管理人员的人口统计数据相似:大多数FM员工是男性,中年,白人,受过大学教育并在内部工作。虽然医疗保健和非医疗保健设施管理人员在各个工作级别上的职责相似,但医疗保健行业的入门级FM角色的薪酬明显低于其他行业的入门级FM角色。与其他行业相比,医疗保健FM的低薪酬可能会加剧与人才招聘和保留相关的持续挑战,并有理由提高薪酬水平,以提高对医疗保健FM顶尖人才的吸引力。医疗保健和非医疗保健行业都雇佣大学毕业生从事入门级的FM工作,但医疗保健行业更倾向于雇佣文科专业的人,而其他行业更倾向于雇佣与建筑环境相关学科(如FM和工程)的人。为了弥补入门级工资低的问题,医疗机构可能会把招聘重点放在文科学生身上,这些学生在建筑环境方面几乎没有接受过培训,因为他们的工资预期较低。年长的医疗保健机构专业人员在当前雇主的工作任期也比其他行业年长的医疗机构专业人员短;这一趋势似乎是最近才出现的,与薪酬或COVID-19大流行无关。高级FM退休人数的激增可能会为医疗保健行业较年长的初级和中级FM人员创造晋升机会;如果这种情况是一个因素,应该进行研究,以了解其对招聘和发展医疗保健FM人才的影响。研究限制/影响仅来自研究时在医疗机构运营工作的美国受访者的数据被纳入数据分析。原创性/价值医疗保健组织可以利用该研究的结果来帮助解决其行业员工招聘、保留和继任计划中独有的FM劳动力挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信