{"title":"Asian American Connective Action in the Age of Social Media: Civic Engagement, Contested Issues, and Emerging Identities","authors":"Yao Li","doi":"10.1177/00943061231172096s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activism among Asian Americans has risen in recent years. Asian American Connective Action in the Age of Social Media: Civic Engagement, Contested Issues, and Emerging Identities is a timely book exploring the way Asian Americans use social media to participate in civic activities and politics in the United States, as well as how these experiences affect their political identities. This book is highly relevant for anyone seeking to understand the use of social media in mobilization, the impact of social media on participatory politics, and the racial politics of Asian Americans. In Chapter One, author James S. Lai sets the discussion in the context of two seemingly opposing trends among Asian Americans: low voter participation, on the one hand, and high digital connectivity with the Asian American community, on the other. Lai then poses the book’s main research questions, which include 1) how online ‘‘connective action’’—actions such as posting and creating a chat group via social media platforms to voice and organize group concerns—can facilitate offline civic engagement (such as political protest), 2) the extent to which the panethnic identity in the Asian American community emerges during online connective action campaigns, and 3) how, given the ideological, ethnic, and class diversity within their national community, Asian Americans can fit in with future progressive, multiracial political coalitions on contentious public policy issues such as racial profiling and affirmative action. Chapter Two sets the theoretical background: in particular, how this book engages in the discussion on racial politics and the possible role of social media in shifting race relations, political incorporation, and current racial hierarchies. Chapter Three establishes a theoretical model that frames the three dimensions—the Medium Dimension, the Goals Dimension, and the Site Dimension—within which Asian American connective action takes place. Chapters Four through Nine—the main body of the book—zoom in on six diverse case studies of connective action by Asian Americans, revealing the heterogeneity among Asian groups and their issues. These cases include mobilization around the 2016 trial of police officer Peter Liang for killing Akai Gurley (an unarmed African American), the fight against affirmative action in higher education admissions in California in 2012, the battle against a 2016 California Assembly bill on Data Disaggregation of Asian Americans, the exclusively online Asian American organizations’ activism on immigration issues, the 2016 California textbook controversy regarding efforts to prevent India from being replaced by South Asia in California textbooks, and activism in connection with the erecting of monuments in U.S. cities to commemorate the atrocity of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino comfort women who were forced to serve as sex slaves for the Japanese military during World War II. These case studies reveal the diversity and tension in civic participation within the Asian American community. The trial of Peter Liang is a prime example of the ideological divisions within this community. As Lai argues, first-generation Chinese American protesters tend to focus primarily on Liang’s civil rights and the perceptions that he was a racial scapegoat, whereas the central issues for progressive Asian American activists who are part of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement are that of White supremacy and Asian American privilege. Additionally, the patterns of activism diverge. Some Asian Americans’ civic activities embody an inward pattern, with mobilization rooted in ethnic/community networks, whereas other activities are characterized by an outward pattern, with an emphasis on panethnic and multiracial coalitions with African American and Latinx people. Moreover, the case studies illustrate that, far from being unified, the Asian identity consists of differences concerning class, religion, language, 254 Reviews","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"254 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231172096s","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Activism among Asian Americans has risen in recent years. Asian American Connective Action in the Age of Social Media: Civic Engagement, Contested Issues, and Emerging Identities is a timely book exploring the way Asian Americans use social media to participate in civic activities and politics in the United States, as well as how these experiences affect their political identities. This book is highly relevant for anyone seeking to understand the use of social media in mobilization, the impact of social media on participatory politics, and the racial politics of Asian Americans. In Chapter One, author James S. Lai sets the discussion in the context of two seemingly opposing trends among Asian Americans: low voter participation, on the one hand, and high digital connectivity with the Asian American community, on the other. Lai then poses the book’s main research questions, which include 1) how online ‘‘connective action’’—actions such as posting and creating a chat group via social media platforms to voice and organize group concerns—can facilitate offline civic engagement (such as political protest), 2) the extent to which the panethnic identity in the Asian American community emerges during online connective action campaigns, and 3) how, given the ideological, ethnic, and class diversity within their national community, Asian Americans can fit in with future progressive, multiracial political coalitions on contentious public policy issues such as racial profiling and affirmative action. Chapter Two sets the theoretical background: in particular, how this book engages in the discussion on racial politics and the possible role of social media in shifting race relations, political incorporation, and current racial hierarchies. Chapter Three establishes a theoretical model that frames the three dimensions—the Medium Dimension, the Goals Dimension, and the Site Dimension—within which Asian American connective action takes place. Chapters Four through Nine—the main body of the book—zoom in on six diverse case studies of connective action by Asian Americans, revealing the heterogeneity among Asian groups and their issues. These cases include mobilization around the 2016 trial of police officer Peter Liang for killing Akai Gurley (an unarmed African American), the fight against affirmative action in higher education admissions in California in 2012, the battle against a 2016 California Assembly bill on Data Disaggregation of Asian Americans, the exclusively online Asian American organizations’ activism on immigration issues, the 2016 California textbook controversy regarding efforts to prevent India from being replaced by South Asia in California textbooks, and activism in connection with the erecting of monuments in U.S. cities to commemorate the atrocity of Korean, Chinese, and Filipino comfort women who were forced to serve as sex slaves for the Japanese military during World War II. These case studies reveal the diversity and tension in civic participation within the Asian American community. The trial of Peter Liang is a prime example of the ideological divisions within this community. As Lai argues, first-generation Chinese American protesters tend to focus primarily on Liang’s civil rights and the perceptions that he was a racial scapegoat, whereas the central issues for progressive Asian American activists who are part of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement are that of White supremacy and Asian American privilege. Additionally, the patterns of activism diverge. Some Asian Americans’ civic activities embody an inward pattern, with mobilization rooted in ethnic/community networks, whereas other activities are characterized by an outward pattern, with an emphasis on panethnic and multiracial coalitions with African American and Latinx people. Moreover, the case studies illustrate that, far from being unified, the Asian identity consists of differences concerning class, religion, language, 254 Reviews
近年来,亚裔美国人的行动主义有所抬头。《亚裔美国人在社交媒体时代的联系行动:公民参与、争议问题和新兴身份》是一本及时的书,探讨了亚裔美国人使用社交媒体参与美国公民活动和政治的方式,以及这些经历如何影响他们的政治身份。这本书对于任何想要了解社交媒体在动员中的使用、社交媒体对参与性政治的影响以及亚裔美国人的种族政治的人来说都是非常相关的。在第一章中,作者James S. Lai将讨论置于亚裔美国人中两种看似相反的趋势的背景下:一方面是低选民参与度,另一方面是与亚裔美国人社区的高数字连接。然后,赖提出了本书的主要研究问题,包括1)在线“连接行动”——通过社交媒体平台发布和创建聊天小组来表达和组织群体关注的行动——如何促进线下公民参与(如政治抗议),2)亚裔美国人社区的泛种族身份在在线连接行动运动中出现的程度,以及3)考虑到意识形态、种族、在种族定性和平权法案等有争议的公共政策问题上,亚裔美国人可以融入未来进步的多种族政治联盟。第二章设置了理论背景:特别是,本书如何参与种族政治的讨论,以及社交媒体在改变种族关系、政治整合和当前种族等级方面可能发挥的作用。第三章建立了一个理论模型,构建了亚裔美国人关联行为发生的三个维度——媒介维度、目标维度和场所维度。第四章到第九章——本书的主体部分——聚焦于六个不同的亚裔美国人联系行为的案例研究,揭示了亚裔群体及其问题的异质性。这些案例包括围绕2016年彼得·梁(Peter Liang)警官杀害阿凯·格利(Akai Gurley,一名手无寸铁的非洲裔美国人)的审判动员、2012年反对加州高等教育录取平权法案的斗争、反对2016年加州议会关于亚裔美国人数据分类的法案的斗争、亚裔美国人专属在线组织在移民问题上的行动主义、2016年加州教科书中关于阻止印度被南亚取代的争议,以及在美国城市建立纪念二战期间被迫为日本军队充当性奴隶的韩国、中国和菲律宾慰安妇的纪念碑的行动主义。这些案例研究揭示了亚裔美国人社区公民参与的多样性和紧张关系。彼得梁的审判是这个群体内部意识形态分歧的一个典型例子。正如赖所言,第一代华裔抗议者往往主要关注梁的民权和他是种族替罪羊的看法,而作为“黑人的命也是命”(BLM)运动一部分的进步亚裔美国活动家的核心问题是白人至上主义和亚裔美国人特权。此外,行动主义的模式也存在分歧。一些亚裔美国人的公民活动体现了一种内向的模式,其动员植根于种族/社区网络,而其他活动的特点是一种外向的模式,强调与非裔美国人和拉丁裔人的泛民族和多种族联盟。此外,个案研究表明,亚洲人的身份远非统一的,而是由阶级、宗教、语言等方面的差异构成的