Evaluation of the Cooking Cultures and Practices in Rural Uganda

H. K. Nsamba, R. Ssali, S. Ssali, F. Matovu, J. Wasswa, H. Balimunsi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Cooking Cultures and Practices in Rural Uganda","authors":"H. K. Nsamba, R. Ssali, S. Ssali, F. Matovu, J. Wasswa, H. Balimunsi","doi":"10.4236/JSBS.2021.111003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many communities across the globe still practice \npoor cooking cultures as part of their well-being to prepare food and other \nheating activities. Such bad cooking practices are not environmentally friendly, \nare wasteful and have adverse health \neffects. This work presents the results of the survey that was conducted to \nestablish the existing cooking practices commonly used in Uganda, identify the \ncommonly used fuel during cooking, identify perceptions on improved cooking \nstoves (ICS), perceived preferences during cooking as well as identify whether \nusers are aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking and describe \ncommunity opinions of ICS for rural communities in Uganda. The interviews were \nconducted on household levels across all the regions covering Uganda’s major \nrural regions. It was observed that the largest population of rural Ugandans still use the 3 stone stove fire for cooking with \na percentage of 53.5%, Charcoal stove, 27.3%, Improved cooking stove, 16.9%, \nElectric cookers,1.2%, LPG 0.7% and biogas 0.5% for the preparation of their various types of cooked foods while \nforest firewood is the commonly used biomass fuel for cooking with a percentage \nof 66.8% compared to Charcoal, Briquettes, Saw \ndust and others with a percentage of 27.1%, 0.7%, 0.7%, 1.1% \nrespectively. This reveals the great majority of users whose life is at risk as \n3 stone stoves are characterized by low efficiency and high smoke production \nwhich increases the health risks of the users as well as increase the risk of \ndeforestation rates. Household cooks showed great willingness to pay for a \nnovel stove type in all the 4 regions but \nfrom the survey data, it was indicated that the preferences varied from one \nregion to another with a great majority preferring minimal smoke production \nwith increased heat retention capacity. It was revealed that 91.4% of the \ninterviewed households were aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking \nmethods which they resolved by using \nopen space during cooking. There was variation in the quantity of food cooked \nin a day, time spent on cooking and how \noften the cooking is done from one region to another due to the difference in \neconomic activities as well as the different climate factors. While using \ncooking stoves, users preferred large cooking pot space with minimal smoke \nproduction and rapid heating. Such information can act as a basis for the design \nof an improved cooking stove for the rural Ugandan community as engineered \nproducts must be designed to suit the needs of the end-user.","PeriodicalId":71705,"journal":{"name":"可持续生物质能源系统(英文)","volume":"11 1","pages":"33-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"可持续生物质能源系统(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JSBS.2021.111003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many communities across the globe still practice poor cooking cultures as part of their well-being to prepare food and other heating activities. Such bad cooking practices are not environmentally friendly, are wasteful and have adverse health effects. This work presents the results of the survey that was conducted to establish the existing cooking practices commonly used in Uganda, identify the commonly used fuel during cooking, identify perceptions on improved cooking stoves (ICS), perceived preferences during cooking as well as identify whether users are aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking and describe community opinions of ICS for rural communities in Uganda. The interviews were conducted on household levels across all the regions covering Uganda’s major rural regions. It was observed that the largest population of rural Ugandans still use the 3 stone stove fire for cooking with a percentage of 53.5%, Charcoal stove, 27.3%, Improved cooking stove, 16.9%, Electric cookers,1.2%, LPG 0.7% and biogas 0.5% for the preparation of their various types of cooked foods while forest firewood is the commonly used biomass fuel for cooking with a percentage of 66.8% compared to Charcoal, Briquettes, Saw dust and others with a percentage of 27.1%, 0.7%, 0.7%, 1.1% respectively. This reveals the great majority of users whose life is at risk as 3 stone stoves are characterized by low efficiency and high smoke production which increases the health risks of the users as well as increase the risk of deforestation rates. Household cooks showed great willingness to pay for a novel stove type in all the 4 regions but from the survey data, it was indicated that the preferences varied from one region to another with a great majority preferring minimal smoke production with increased heat retention capacity. It was revealed that 91.4% of the interviewed households were aware of the health challenges due to poor cooking methods which they resolved by using open space during cooking. There was variation in the quantity of food cooked in a day, time spent on cooking and how often the cooking is done from one region to another due to the difference in economic activities as well as the different climate factors. While using cooking stoves, users preferred large cooking pot space with minimal smoke production and rapid heating. Such information can act as a basis for the design of an improved cooking stove for the rural Ugandan community as engineered products must be designed to suit the needs of the end-user.
乌干达农村烹饪文化与实践评价
全球许多社区仍然将糟糕的烹饪文化作为他们准备食物和其他取暖活动的福祉的一部分。这种糟糕的烹饪做法不环保,浪费时间,对健康有不良影响。这项工作介绍了调查结果,该调查旨在确定乌干达常用的现有烹饪方法,确定烹饪过程中常用的燃料,确定对改进炉灶的看法,在烹饪过程中感知到的偏好,以及确定用户是否意识到由于烹饪不当而带来的健康挑战,并描述乌干达农村社区ICS的社区意见。采访在乌干达主要农村地区的所有地区的家庭层面进行。据观察,乌干达农村人口最多的地区仍然使用3石炉做饭,比例为53.5%,木炭炉为27.3%,改良炉灶为16.9%,电炊具为1.2%,液化石油气0.7%和沼气0.5%用于制备各种类型的熟食,而森林木柴是常用的生物质烹饪燃料,其比例为66.8%,而木炭、型煤、木屑和其他燃料的比例分别为27.1%、0.7%、0.7%和1.1%。这表明,绝大多数用户的生命都处于危险之中,因为3石炉的特点是效率低,烟雾产生量大,这增加了用户的健康风险,也增加了森林砍伐率的风险。在所有4个地区,家庭厨师都非常愿意为新型炉灶付费,但从调查数据来看,不同地区的偏好各不相同,绝大多数人更喜欢产生最小的烟雾并增加保温能力。据透露,91.4%的受访家庭意识到由于烹饪方法不当而带来的健康挑战,他们通过在烹饪过程中使用开放空间来解决这一问题。由于经济活动的差异以及不同的气候因素,一天烹饪的食物数量、烹饪时间以及不同地区的烹饪频率都存在差异。在使用炉灶时,用户更喜欢大的烹饪锅空间,产生的烟雾最少,加热速度快。这些信息可以作为为乌干达农村社区设计改进炉灶的基础,因为工程产品的设计必须满足最终用户的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书