Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive: Is There a Better Way to Restore Balance in Copyright?

Q3 Social Sciences

Internet Reference Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.1080/10875301.2021.1875100

Robin Schard

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Using the opening of the National Emergency Library as an opportunity, four large publishers, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons, and Penguin Random House, filed suit against the Internet Archive claiming copyright infringement. This article discusses the lawsuit and the claims on both sides before discussing the weaknesses for the parties, and recommending that negotiation would be the best way to move forward.

查看原文本刊更多论文

阿歇特图书集团诉互联网档案馆:是否有更好的方式恢复版权平衡?

摘要以国家应急图书馆开放为契机，阿歇特图书集团、哈珀柯林斯出版社、约翰威利和企鹅兰登书屋四家大型出版商以侵犯版权为由，对互联网档案馆提起诉讼。本文讨论了诉讼和双方的主张，然后讨论了双方的弱点，并建议谈判将是最好的推进方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Internet Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Internet Reference Services Quarterly tackles the tough job of keeping librarians up to date with the latest developments in Internet referencing and librarianship. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal is designed to function as a comprehensive information source librarians can turn to and count on for keeping up-to-date on emerging technological innovations, while emphasizing theoretical, research, and practical applications of Internet-related information services, sources, and resources. Librarians from any size or type of library in any discipline get the knowledge needed on how to best improve service through one of the most powerful reference tools available on the Internet.