Eyes or mouth? Exploring eye gaze patterns and their relation with early stress perception in European Portuguese

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Marisa Cruz, Joseph Butler, C. Severino, Marisa G. Filipe, Sónia Frota
{"title":"Eyes or mouth? Exploring eye gaze patterns and their relation with early stress perception in European Portuguese","authors":"Marisa Cruz, Joseph Butler, C. Severino, Marisa G. Filipe, Sónia Frota","doi":"10.5334/jpl.240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has shown that eye gaze patterns relate to language development, with more attention to the mouth signaling ongoing acquisition. We examined infants’ eye gaze in a stress perception experiment, in which European Portuguese (EP) learning infants showed a preference for the iambic stress pattern. Specifically, we asked whether there was a relation between eye gaze patterns and the preferred stress pattern. Eye gaze patterns of 25 monolingual typically developing infants aged 5–6 months old were examined using eye-tracking. Our results show that, although an interaction between looks to the area of interest (face, eyes, mouth, and arm) and stress preference was not found, eye gaze to the mouth region (and to the face) was modulated by the stress pattern, with more attention to the mouth in infants that do not show an iambic preference. These findings add further support for infants’ use of eye gaze in early language development. They also highlight the need for multimodal approaches for a better understanding of language development. In the particular case of the challenging topic of the acquisition of stress in European Portuguese, they provide converging evidence for an advantage of iambic stress in early development. (195 words).","PeriodicalId":41871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Portuguese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Portuguese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Previous research has shown that eye gaze patterns relate to language development, with more attention to the mouth signaling ongoing acquisition. We examined infants’ eye gaze in a stress perception experiment, in which European Portuguese (EP) learning infants showed a preference for the iambic stress pattern. Specifically, we asked whether there was a relation between eye gaze patterns and the preferred stress pattern. Eye gaze patterns of 25 monolingual typically developing infants aged 5–6 months old were examined using eye-tracking. Our results show that, although an interaction between looks to the area of interest (face, eyes, mouth, and arm) and stress preference was not found, eye gaze to the mouth region (and to the face) was modulated by the stress pattern, with more attention to the mouth in infants that do not show an iambic preference. These findings add further support for infants’ use of eye gaze in early language development. They also highlight the need for multimodal approaches for a better understanding of language development. In the particular case of the challenging topic of the acquisition of stress in European Portuguese, they provide converging evidence for an advantage of iambic stress in early development. (195 words).
眼睛还是嘴巴?探究欧洲葡萄牙人的眼睛注视模式及其与早期压力感知的关系
先前的研究表明,眼睛注视模式与语言发展有关,对嘴部的关注更多,表明正在进行的习得。我们在一项压力感知实验中检测了婴儿的眼睛注视,在该实验中,学习欧洲葡萄牙语(EP)的婴儿表现出对抑扬格压力模式的偏好。具体来说,我们询问了眼睛注视模式和首选压力模式之间是否存在关系。采用眼动追踪技术对25名5-6个月大的单语正常发育婴儿的眼球注视模式进行了研究。我们的研究结果表明,虽然没有发现注视感兴趣的区域(脸、眼睛、嘴巴和手臂)和压力偏好之间的相互作用,但眼睛注视嘴巴区域(和面部)受到压力模式的调节,没有表现出抑扬格偏好的婴儿更关注嘴巴。这些发现进一步支持了婴儿在早期语言发展中使用眼睛注视的观点。他们还强调需要多模态方法来更好地理解语言发展。在欧洲葡萄牙语重音习得的特殊情况下,他们为抑扬格重音在早期发展中的优势提供了一致的证据。(195字)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信