Sodišče slovenske narodne časti na Ptuju

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Studia Historica Slovenica Pub Date : 2019-08-10 DOI:10.32874/shs.2019-03

Mateja Čoh Kladnik

{"title":"Sodišče slovenske narodne časti na Ptuju","authors":"Mateja Čoh Kladnik","doi":"10.32874/shs.2019-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Category: 1.01 Original scientific paper\nLanguage: Original in Slovene (Abstract in Slovene and English, Summary in English) \n\nKeywords: Court of Slovenian National Honour, judges, criminal procedure, penal policy, criminal proceedings, loss of national honour, forced labour, confiscation of property, Ptuj, 1945\n\nAbstract: At the beginning of June 1945, the Court of Slovenian National Honor was established. Until the end of August 1945, those who cooperated in any way with the occupiers during the war were put to trial. It imposed the following penalties and/or sentences: loss of national honour, light or heavy forced labour, and total or partial confiscation of property for the benefit of the State. The five-member chambers operated in Ljubljana, Kranj, Novo mesto, Celje, Maribor, Ptuj, and Murska Sobota. The chairs and secretaries of the chambers were jurists, and the members of the chambers were persons without legal qualifications. There were two chambers in Ptuj; the first hearing against the eight defendants was on July 9, 1945. The proceedings before the court were prompt. In total, 382 persons appeared before the two chambers in Ptuj, of which 308 were sentenced and 74 acquitted. Following the abolition of the Court and the granting of a pardon, the convicts were fully spared from light or heavy forced labour. The legal consequences for those who were stripped of their national honour were limited to the loss of political and civil rights, including voting rights. The confiscation penalty remained in force.","PeriodicalId":38093,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica Slovenica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32874/shs.2019-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Category: 1.01 Original scientific paper Language: Original in Slovene (Abstract in Slovene and English, Summary in English) Keywords: Court of Slovenian National Honour, judges, criminal procedure, penal policy, criminal proceedings, loss of national honour, forced labour, confiscation of property, Ptuj, 1945 Abstract: At the beginning of June 1945, the Court of Slovenian National Honor was established. Until the end of August 1945, those who cooperated in any way with the occupiers during the war were put to trial. It imposed the following penalties and/or sentences: loss of national honour, light or heavy forced labour, and total or partial confiscation of property for the benefit of the State. The five-member chambers operated in Ljubljana, Kranj, Novo mesto, Celje, Maribor, Ptuj, and Murska Sobota. The chairs and secretaries of the chambers were jurists, and the members of the chambers were persons without legal qualifications. There were two chambers in Ptuj; the first hearing against the eight defendants was on July 9, 1945. The proceedings before the court were prompt. In total, 382 persons appeared before the two chambers in Ptuj, of which 308 were sentenced and 74 acquitted. Following the abolition of the Court and the granting of a pardon, the convicts were fully spared from light or heavy forced labour. The legal consequences for those who were stripped of their national honour were limited to the loss of political and civil rights, including voting rights. The confiscation penalty remained in force.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ptuj斯洛文尼亚国家荣誉法庭

类别：1.01科学论文原件语言：斯洛文尼亚文原件（斯洛文尼亚文和英文摘要，英文摘要）关键词：斯洛文尼亚国家荣誉法院，法官，刑事诉讼，刑事政策，刑事诉讼程序，丧失国家荣誉，强迫劳动，没收财产，Ptuj，1945摘要：1945年6月初，斯洛文尼亚国家荣誉法院成立。直到1945年8月底，那些在战争期间以任何方式与占领者合作的人都受到了审判。它规定了以下惩罚和（或）判刑：丧失国家荣誉、轻度或重度强迫劳动以及为国家利益全部或部分没收财产。由五名成员组成的分庭在卢布尔雅那、克兰吉、诺沃梅斯托、塞尔杰、马里博尔、普图吉和穆尔斯卡·索博塔运作。各分庭的主席和秘书都是法学家，各分庭成员都是没有法律资格的人。普图吉有两个房间；针对八名被告的第一次听证会是在1945年7月9日。法院的诉讼程序很迅速。总共有382人在普图吉的两个分庭出庭，其中308人被判刑，74人无罪释放。在法院被废除并获得赦免后，罪犯完全免于遭受轻度或重度强迫劳动。那些被剥夺国家荣誉的人的法律后果仅限于失去政治和公民权利，包括投票权。没收处罚仍然有效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studia Historica Slovenica Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Studia historica Slovenica (SHS) is a periodical scientific publication published by the Historical association of Franc Kovačič PhD, Koroška cesta 160, Maribor. The publication publishes historical articles and other humanistic and sociological articles that adjoin historical science. Studia historica Slovenica is issued in three volumes a year. The first two volumes publish articles in Slovene language – with summaries in English, German, Italian, French or Russian language and abstracts in English. The third volume is a foreign language volume, which is intended for publishing articles written by local and foreign authors in one of the world languages – with summaries and abstracts in Slovene language. An article, delivered or sent to the editorial board, can comprise of at most 30 one-sided typed pages with 30 lines per page (52,750 print signs). It has to be delivered on a computer diskette (edited in Word for Windows) and in a printed form. Image material in the form of a laser print or in electron form (PDF or TIF format) must be equipped with subtitles and the source quotation. The author must submit following data: name and surname, academic title, occupation, institution of occupation, its address and e-mail. Delivered article must be equipped with: a summary (30-45 lines), an abstract (6-10 lines) and key words. Summary must be understandable by itself, without reading the article as a whole. In writing whole sentences must be used, less known abbreviations and shortenings should be avoided.