«Une barricade, non un gouvernement» Contrasting Views of Association in the Paris Commune

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE

NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-02-09 DOI:10.1353/NCF.2021.0003

W. Roberts

{"title":"«Une barricade, non un gouvernement» Contrasting Views of Association in the Paris Commune","authors":"W. Roberts","doi":"10.1353/NCF.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay recovers a lost debate about the political aspirations of the Commune. Recent scholarship has rightly emphasized that the common theme of Communard initiatives was association. However, Communards were torn between competing interpretations of association. According to the predominant sense, indebted to Proudhon, associations were expressions of worker autonomy. They were voluntary but morally obligatory contracts for mutual benefit. Opposed to this conception was another, according to which associations were necessary defensive formations, meant to resist economic and political domination. The most articulate advocate of this defensive conception was Prosper-Olivier Lissagaray (1838–1901), and this essay focuses on reconstructing his theory of association during and after the Commune. According to Lissagaray, association is not voluntary, but a practical necessity, a barricade against the overwhelming power of capital and the state. The tension between these divergent understandings of association is essential to the history and legacy of the Commune.","PeriodicalId":42524,"journal":{"name":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","volume":"49 1","pages":"173 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/NCF.2021.0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/NCF.2021.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay recovers a lost debate about the political aspirations of the Commune. Recent scholarship has rightly emphasized that the common theme of Communard initiatives was association. However, Communards were torn between competing interpretations of association. According to the predominant sense, indebted to Proudhon, associations were expressions of worker autonomy. They were voluntary but morally obligatory contracts for mutual benefit. Opposed to this conception was another, according to which associations were necessary defensive formations, meant to resist economic and political domination. The most articulate advocate of this defensive conception was Prosper-Olivier Lissagaray (1838–1901), and this essay focuses on reconstructing his theory of association during and after the Commune. According to Lissagaray, association is not voluntary, but a practical necessity, a barricade against the overwhelming power of capital and the state. The tension between these divergent understandings of association is essential to the history and legacy of the Commune.

查看原文本刊更多论文

“一个街垒，非政府”巴黎公社的结社观对比

摘要：本文恢复了一场关于公社政治抱负的争论。最近的学术界正确地强调了公社倡议的共同主题是结社。然而，Communards在对关联的相互竞争的解释之间左右为难。根据占主导地位的意义，由于普劳德洪，协会是工人自主性的表达。它们是自愿的，但在道德上有义务的互惠合同。反对这一概念的是另一个概念，根据该概念，协会是必要的防御组织，旨在抵抗经济和政治统治。这种防御概念最清晰的倡导者是Prosper Olivier Lissagaray（1838–1901），本文着重于重建他在公社期间和之后的联想理论。根据Lissagaray的说法，结社不是自愿的，而是一种实际的必要性，是对抗首都和国家压倒性权力的屏障。这些对联想的不同理解之间的紧张关系对公社的历史和遗产至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES LITERATURE, ROMANCE-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Nineteenth-Century French Studies provides scholars and students with the opportunity to examine new trends, review promising research findings, and become better acquainted with professional developments in the field. Scholarly articles on all aspects of nineteenth-century French literature and criticism are invited. Published articles are peer reviewed to ensure scholarly integrity. This journal has an extensive book review section covering a variety of disciplines. Nineteenth-Century French Studies is published twice a year in two double issues, fall/winter and spring/summer.