The Impacts of Tax Revenue and Investment on the Economic Growth in Southeast Asian Countries

H. Nguyen, S. Darsono
{"title":"The Impacts of Tax Revenue and Investment on the Economic Growth in Southeast Asian Countries","authors":"H. Nguyen, S. Darsono","doi":"10.18196/jai.v23i1.13270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aims: This study focuses on the correlation between tax revenue, investment, and economic growth, taking into account the non-linear effects of tax revenue.Design/Methodology/Approach: Macro data of nine countries in ASEAN (including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) in 2000 - 2020 were extracted from the World Bank database. This research employed panel data estimations.Research findings: This study found statistical evidence of a negative effect of tax revenue on economic growth. However, when considering the non-linear effects of tax revenue, the empirical findings showed that higher tax revenue could reduce the disadvantages of tax impacts to boost economic growth. The negative effect of taxes is as obvious as the economic growth theories, but it depends on the taxation revenue. Lower tax revenue may encourage saving and investment, but it also leads to an increased government deficit, reducing economic growth through government debt, spending and investment. Moreover, this study provides consistent evidence of investment’s positive effect on economic growth in ASEAN countries during the research period.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The theoretical contribution provides evidence on the direct effect of tax revenue and investment on economic growth with a broader understanding of the tax’s non-linear effects and investment contributions in the ASEAN. The study confirms the vital role of government activity in regulating the development of the economy through taxation and investment. Practitioner/Policy implication: The severe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased macroeconomic uncertainties, including uncertainty over savings, investment, and spending, potentially leading to tax revenue and investment losses. It, in turn, affects economic activities, so it requires careful consideration. Learned lessons from this study can prepare for future economic shocks and financial crises to reduce negative impacts on economic growth, including their adverse tax revenue effects.Research limitation: This study is limited by looking at the tax revenue ratio overview, which ignores the tax structure due to the lack of data collection. The following studies need to clarify the tax structure of ASEAN countries to determine which tax gives a negative impact/and which tax has a positive effect on economic growth.","PeriodicalId":33157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i1.13270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Research aims: This study focuses on the correlation between tax revenue, investment, and economic growth, taking into account the non-linear effects of tax revenue.Design/Methodology/Approach: Macro data of nine countries in ASEAN (including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) in 2000 - 2020 were extracted from the World Bank database. This research employed panel data estimations.Research findings: This study found statistical evidence of a negative effect of tax revenue on economic growth. However, when considering the non-linear effects of tax revenue, the empirical findings showed that higher tax revenue could reduce the disadvantages of tax impacts to boost economic growth. The negative effect of taxes is as obvious as the economic growth theories, but it depends on the taxation revenue. Lower tax revenue may encourage saving and investment, but it also leads to an increased government deficit, reducing economic growth through government debt, spending and investment. Moreover, this study provides consistent evidence of investment’s positive effect on economic growth in ASEAN countries during the research period.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The theoretical contribution provides evidence on the direct effect of tax revenue and investment on economic growth with a broader understanding of the tax’s non-linear effects and investment contributions in the ASEAN. The study confirms the vital role of government activity in regulating the development of the economy through taxation and investment. Practitioner/Policy implication: The severe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased macroeconomic uncertainties, including uncertainty over savings, investment, and spending, potentially leading to tax revenue and investment losses. It, in turn, affects economic activities, so it requires careful consideration. Learned lessons from this study can prepare for future economic shocks and financial crises to reduce negative impacts on economic growth, including their adverse tax revenue effects.Research limitation: This study is limited by looking at the tax revenue ratio overview, which ignores the tax structure due to the lack of data collection. The following studies need to clarify the tax structure of ASEAN countries to determine which tax gives a negative impact/and which tax has a positive effect on economic growth.
税收和投资对东南亚国家经济增长的影响
研究目的:本研究关注税收、投资和经济增长之间的相关性,考虑到税收的非线性效应。设计/方法/方法:从世界银行数据库中提取东盟9个国家(包括文莱、柬埔寨、印度尼西亚、老挝、马来西亚、菲律宾、新加坡、泰国和越南)2000-2020年的宏观数据。这项研究采用了面板数据估计。研究结果:这项研究发现了税收对经济增长产生负面影响的统计证据。然而,在考虑税收的非线性效应时,实证结果表明,更高的税收可以减少税收影响对促进经济增长的不利影响。税收的负面影响与经济增长理论一样明显,但它取决于税收收入。税收减少可能会鼓励储蓄和投资,但也会导致政府赤字增加,通过政府债务、支出和投资降低经济增长。此外,本研究为研究期间投资对东盟国家经济增长的积极影响提供了一致的证据。理论贡献/原创性:理论贡献为税收和投资对经济增长的直接影响提供了证据,更广泛地理解了税收的非线性效应和对东盟的投资贡献。该研究证实了政府活动在通过税收和投资调节经济发展方面的重要作用。从业者/政策含义:新冠肺炎疫情的严重影响增加了宏观经济的不确定性,包括储蓄、投资和支出的不确定性。这可能导致税收和投资损失。它反过来又影响经济活动,因此需要仔细考虑。从这项研究中吸取的经验教训可以为未来的经济冲击和金融危机做好准备,以减少对经济增长的负面影响,包括其对税收的不利影响。研究局限性:本研究仅限于税收收入比率概述,由于缺乏数据收集,忽略了税收结构。以下研究需要澄清东盟国家的税收结构,以确定哪种税收对经济增长产生负面影响/哪种税收有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信