Comparison of Reactive Blue 203 Dye Removal Using Ultraviolet Irradiation, Ferrate (VI) Oxidation Process and MgO Nanoparticles

Q4 Environmental Science
Amirreza Talaiekhozani, Nilofar Torkan, Fahad Banisharif, Zeinab Eskandari, S. Rezania, Junboum Park, F. Aminsharei, A. Amani
{"title":"Comparison of Reactive Blue 203 Dye Removal Using Ultraviolet Irradiation, Ferrate (VI) Oxidation Process and MgO Nanoparticles","authors":"Amirreza Talaiekhozani, Nilofar Torkan, Fahad Banisharif, Zeinab Eskandari, S. Rezania, Junboum Park, F. Aminsharei, A. Amani","doi":"10.15171/AJEHE.2018.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effect of various parameters on the removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye from wastewater using ferrate(VI) oxidation process, ultraviolet radiation (UV) radiation and MgO nanoparticles under batch mode. Although several studies have been carried out on dye removal, there is no study on the removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye using ferrate(VI) oxidation process, UV radiation, and MgO nanoparticles. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different factors including pH, temperature, contact time, the intensity of UV radiation and the concentration of MgO nanoparticles on Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using the above-mentioned methods. The results showed that the best pH values for dye removal using UV radiation, ferrate(VI), and MgO nanoparticles were 13, 1 and 13, respectively. The best temperature for Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using ferrate(VI) was 50°C. Hence, temperature variation had no significant effect on Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using UV irradiation and absorption by MgO nanoparticles. Based on the results, the best contact time was 15 minutes using UV radiation. The removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye using ferrate(VI) oxidation process was a quick reaction, and in a fraction of a second, the reactions were completed. The results showed that dye removal using MgO nanoparticles could be described by the Temkin isotherm. Therefore, the contact time was not considered as an effective parameter. In addition, the maximum dye removals were 95, 85 and 94% using UV irradiation, ferrate(VI) and MgO nanoparticles.","PeriodicalId":8672,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/AJEHE.2018.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of various parameters on the removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye from wastewater using ferrate(VI) oxidation process, ultraviolet radiation (UV) radiation and MgO nanoparticles under batch mode. Although several studies have been carried out on dye removal, there is no study on the removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye using ferrate(VI) oxidation process, UV radiation, and MgO nanoparticles. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different factors including pH, temperature, contact time, the intensity of UV radiation and the concentration of MgO nanoparticles on Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using the above-mentioned methods. The results showed that the best pH values for dye removal using UV radiation, ferrate(VI), and MgO nanoparticles were 13, 1 and 13, respectively. The best temperature for Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using ferrate(VI) was 50°C. Hence, temperature variation had no significant effect on Reactive Blue 203 dye removal using UV irradiation and absorption by MgO nanoparticles. Based on the results, the best contact time was 15 minutes using UV radiation. The removal of Reactive Blue 203 dye using ferrate(VI) oxidation process was a quick reaction, and in a fraction of a second, the reactions were completed. The results showed that dye removal using MgO nanoparticles could be described by the Temkin isotherm. Therefore, the contact time was not considered as an effective parameter. In addition, the maximum dye removals were 95, 85 and 94% using UV irradiation, ferrate(VI) and MgO nanoparticles.
紫外线、高铁酸盐(VI)氧化法和纳米氧化镁去除活性蓝203染料的比较
本研究采用高铁酸盐(VI)氧化法、紫外线(UV)辐射法和纳米氧化镁(MgO)在间歇模式下对废水中活性蓝203染料的去除效果进行了研究。尽管已经进行了几项关于染料去除的研究,但还没有关于使用高铁酸盐(VI)氧化过程、紫外线辐射和MgO纳米颗粒去除活性蓝203染料的研究。因此,本研究的目的是研究pH、温度、接触时间、紫外线辐射强度和MgO纳米颗粒浓度等不同因素对使用上述方法去除活性蓝203染料的影响。结果表明,使用紫外线辐射、高铁酸盐(VI)和MgO纳米颗粒去除染料的最佳pH值分别为13、1和13。使用高铁酸盐(VI)去除活性蓝203染料的最佳温度为50°C。因此,温度变化对使用紫外线照射和MgO纳米颗粒吸收的活性蓝203染料去除没有显著影响。根据结果,使用紫外线辐射的最佳接触时间为15分钟。使用高铁酸盐(VI)氧化过程去除活性蓝203染料是一个快速反应,并且在几分之一秒内完成了反应。结果表明,使用MgO纳米颗粒去除染料可以用Temkin等温线来描述。因此,接触时间不被认为是一个有效的参数。此外,使用紫外线照射、高铁酸盐(VI)和MgO纳米颗粒的最大染料去除率分别为95%、85%和94%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering
Avicenna Journal of Environmental Health Engineering Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信