The Currency and Relevancy of Confucian Pedagogy in Doctoral Supervision

V. I. Lo
{"title":"The Currency and Relevancy of Confucian Pedagogy in Doctoral Supervision","authors":"V. I. Lo","doi":"10.53300/001c.38545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The training of future academics and researchers is part of higher education. Doctoral studies consist of both teaching and research. Numerous studies have been conducted on the theory and practice of doctoral studies in and across various disciplines. Basically, the central questions of doctoral supervision are why, what, and how. It is imperative for a prospective supervisor to understand why he or she would like to undertake doctoral supervision. This is because the underlying aims will affect the quality of the intellectual and research training experience for both the supervisor and the supervisee. Once the underlying reasons are identified, the next question is what the supervisor wants to achieve. In essence, what a supervisor would like to accomplish in doctoral supervision is a value judgement because to what he or she attaches importance determines the intended outcomes. Towards the specific goals, the supervisor must determine how to materialize them. In fact, what approach or style as well as what policies and strategies should be adopted to cultivate research and scholarship skills in doctoral students constitute a significant portion of existing literature. Given that the ‘how’ is the most challenging element, this study attempts to draw inspirations from the Confucian pedagogy..","PeriodicalId":33279,"journal":{"name":"Bond Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bond Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.38545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The training of future academics and researchers is part of higher education. Doctoral studies consist of both teaching and research. Numerous studies have been conducted on the theory and practice of doctoral studies in and across various disciplines. Basically, the central questions of doctoral supervision are why, what, and how. It is imperative for a prospective supervisor to understand why he or she would like to undertake doctoral supervision. This is because the underlying aims will affect the quality of the intellectual and research training experience for both the supervisor and the supervisee. Once the underlying reasons are identified, the next question is what the supervisor wants to achieve. In essence, what a supervisor would like to accomplish in doctoral supervision is a value judgement because to what he or she attaches importance determines the intended outcomes. Towards the specific goals, the supervisor must determine how to materialize them. In fact, what approach or style as well as what policies and strategies should be adopted to cultivate research and scholarship skills in doctoral students constitute a significant portion of existing literature. Given that the ‘how’ is the most challenging element, this study attempts to draw inspirations from the Confucian pedagogy..
儒家教育学在博士生指导中的流通与相关性
培养未来的学者和研究人员是高等教育的一部分。博士研究包括教学和研究。在各个学科和跨学科的博士研究的理论和实践方面进行了大量研究。基本上,博士生导师的核心问题是为什么、做什么以及如何做。对于一个未来的导师来说,了解他或她为什么想接受博士生导师是必不可少的。这是因为潜在的目标将影响导师和被导师的智力和研究培训体验的质量。一旦确定了根本原因,下一个问题就是主管想要实现什么。从本质上讲,导师希望在博士生导师中完成什么是一种价值判断,因为他或她对什么的重视决定了预期的结果。针对具体目标,主管必须确定如何实现这些目标。事实上,应该采取什么方法或风格以及什么政策和策略来培养博士生的研究和学术技能,构成了现有文献的重要组成部分。鉴于“如何”是最具挑战性的因素,本研究试图从儒家教育学中汲取启示。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信